Working Journalist - Judgment Search Results

Working Journalists of the hindu Madras Vs. Management of the hindu, M ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1961Mad370; (1961)ILLJ288Mad; (1961)1MLJ260

the Management before the Labour Court was that inasmuch as continued support of a substantial section of the working journalist was a sine qua non, for the subsistence of an industrial dispute and as such support had been … service of working journalists and other persons employed in newspaper establishments. Clause (f) of Section 2 defines a working journalist as a person whose principal avocation is that of a journalist and who is employed as such in,

Working Journalists of Tamil Nadu Represented by Madras Union of Journ ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1959Mad501; (1959)IILLJ84Mad; (1959)2MLJ318

a Tamil Weekly newspaper called 'Tamil Nadu' which is being published from Madurai. Ponnuswami, Subramanian and Ramiah were working as proof readers for this newspaper. The Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (Act 45 … being published from Madurai. Ponnuswami, Subramanian and Ramiah were working as proof readers for this newspaper. The Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (Act 45 of 1935) came into force on 20-12-1955. In exercise

Management of Rashtradoot, Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Working Journalist Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1970(20)FLR1]; (1970)ILLJ58SC; (1971)3SCC96; 1969()WLN63

Nos. 129 to 131 of 1969) with certificate depends on the short question whether Dinesh Khare is a working journalist as defined in Section 2(f) of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 45 of … all of its working journalists employees except Dinesh Khare. According to the management, Dinesh Khare was not a working journalist. Khare claimed to be entitled as working journalist to get Rs. 25 per mensem as Interim relief with

Navabharat Press Vs. Nagpur Union Working Journalists and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1989(59)FLR850]; (1995)IIILLJ103Bom

the Partnership Act. The management of Navabharat Press publishes a Hindi daily called 'Navabharat'. The Nagpur Union of Working Journalists claimed bonus at the rate of 20% for Working Journalists employed under the petitioner Navabharat for the … Partnership Act. The management of Navabharat Press publishes a Hindi daily called 'Navabharat'. The Nagpur Union of Working Journalists claimed bonus at the rate of 20% for Working Journalists employed under the petitioner Navabharat for the years

The Hindu, Bombay Vs. Its Workmen (Working Journalists)

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1960)ILLJ110Bom

by tiring the claimant out. The amount claimed, though very large, is fully justified, as due to the working journalist under the heads of retrenchment compensation, gratuity, etc. Along with the statement of claim the union has filed … the Bombay Legislative Assembly was beneficial to Hindu. Even if it is conceded that Sri Salivateeswaran was a working journalist, his conduct disentitled him to the benefits he seeks. In regard to his claim for compensation the management

The Management of tamil Nadu Madurai Vs. Working Journalists of Tamil ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1959Mad343

Nadu' which is being published from Madurai from about 1951. Three individuals named Ponnuswami Subramanian and Ramiah were working as Proof Readers in the 'Tamil Nadu.' Two of them have studied in the fourth form and the … form and the third in the sixth form. On 20-12-1955 Central Act 45 of 1955 called the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 came into force. Under Section 8 of the Act the

Management of the hindu, Madras (Kasturi and Sons Ltd.) Vs. the Workin ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1960Mad196; (1959)IILLJ348Mad

that my personal reputation is as much involved and I submit it is wrong to suggest that any working journalist will deliberately pace himself in such a position. May I also submit in this connection that similar and

The Management of 'The Hindu' Vs. the Working Journalists of 'The Hind ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1959)2MLJ272

that my personal reputation is as much involved and I submit it is wrong to suggest that any Working journalist will deliberately place himself in such a position.May I also submit in this connection that similar and sometimes

Kerala Union of Working Journalists vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 19TH MAGHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 3670 OF 2022 PETITIONERS:1 KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS PUTHENCHANDAYIL, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY 2 SHABEENA K.M @ SHABNA ZIAD. SECRETARY, … DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 19TH MAGHA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 3670 OF 2022 PETITIONERS:1 KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS PUTHENCHANDAYIL, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY 2 SHABEENA K.M @ SHABNA ZIAD. SECRETARY, KERALA

Kerala Union of Working Journalists vs Union of India

Court: Kerala

JUDGMENT DATED 08.02.2022 IN WP(C) 3670/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS IN THE W.P.(C):1 KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS, PUTHENCHANDAYIL, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY 2 SHABEENA K.M @ SHABNA ZIAD, SECRETARY, KERALA … DATED 08.02.2022 IN WP(C) 3670/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS IN THE W.P.(C):1 KERALA UNION OF WORKING JOURNALISTS, PUTHENCHANDAYIL, M.G.ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY 2 SHABEENA K.M @ SHABNA ZIAD, SECRETARY, KERALA UNION