Working Journalist - Judgment Search Results
Working Journalists of the hindu Madras Vs. Management of the hindu, M ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-28-1960
Reported in: AIR1961Mad370; (1961)ILLJ288Mad; (1961)1MLJ260
the Management before the Labour Court was that inasmuch as continued support of a substantial section of the working journalist was a sine qua non, for the subsistence of an industrial dispute and as such support had been … service of working journalists and other persons employed in newspaper establishments. Clause (f) of Section 2 defines a working journalist as a person whose principal avocation is that of a journalist and who is employed as such in,
Working Journalists of Tamil Nadu Represented by Madras Union of Journ ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-24-1959
Reported in: AIR1959Mad501; (1959)IILLJ84Mad; (1959)2MLJ318
a Tamil Weekly newspaper called 'Tamil Nadu' which is being published from Madurai. Ponnuswami, Subramanian and Ramiah were working as proof readers for this newspaper. The Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (Act 45 … being published from Madurai. Ponnuswami, Subramanian and Ramiah were working as proof readers for this newspaper. The Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act (Act 45 of 1935) came into force on 20-12-1955. In exercise
Management of Rashtradoot, Jaipur Vs. Rajasthan Working Journalist Uni ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-22-1969
Reported in: [1970(20)FLR1]; (1970)ILLJ58SC; (1971)3SCC96; 1969()WLN63
Nos. 129 to 131 of 1969) with certificate depends on the short question whether Dinesh Khare is a working journalist as defined in Section 2(f) of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 45 of … all of its working journalists employees except Dinesh Khare. According to the management, Dinesh Khare was not a working journalist. Khare claimed to be entitled as working journalist to get Rs. 25 per mensem as Interim relief with
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Navabharat Press Vs. Nagpur Union Working Journalists and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-21-1989
Reported in: [1989(59)FLR850]; (1995)IIILLJ103Bom
the Partnership Act. The management of Navabharat Press publishes a Hindi daily called 'Navabharat'. The Nagpur Union of Working Journalists claimed bonus at the rate of 20% for Working Journalists employed under the petitioner Navabharat for the … Partnership Act. The management of Navabharat Press publishes a Hindi daily called 'Navabharat'. The Nagpur Union of Working Journalists claimed bonus at the rate of 20% for Working Journalists employed under the petitioner Navabharat for the years
The Hindu, Bombay Vs. Its Workmen (Working Journalists)
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-03-1959
Reported in: (1960)ILLJ110Bom
by tiring the claimant out. The amount claimed, though very large, is fully justified, as due to the working journalist under the heads of retrenchment compensation, gratuity, etc. Along with the statement of claim the union has filed … the Bombay Legislative Assembly was beneficial to Hindu. Even if it is conceded that Sri Salivateeswaran was a working journalist, his conduct disentitled him to the benefits he seeks. In regard to his claim for compensation the management
The Management of tamil Nadu Madurai Vs. Working Journalists of Tamil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-09-1958
Reported in: AIR1959Mad343
Nadu' which is being published from Madurai from about 1951. Three individuals named Ponnuswami Subramanian and Ramiah were working as Proof Readers in the 'Tamil Nadu.' Two of them have studied in the fourth form and the … form and the third in the sixth form. On 20-12-1955 Central Act 45 of 1955 called the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 came into force. Under Section 8 of the Act the
Management of the hindu, Madras (Kasturi and Sons Ltd.) Vs. the Workin ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-1959
Reported in: AIR1960Mad196; (1959)IILLJ348Mad
that my personal reputation is as much involved and I submit it is wrong to suggest that any working journalist will deliberately pace himself in such a position. May I also submit in this connection that similar and
The Management of 'The Hindu' Vs. the Working Journalists of 'The Hind ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-1959
Reported in: (1959)2MLJ272
that my personal reputation is as much involved and I submit it is wrong to suggest that any Working journalist will deliberately place himself in such a position.May I also submit in this connection that similar and sometimes
Workmen of Sadakt (Represented by Bihar Working Journalists Union) and ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Feb-20-1998
newspapers. Palekar award classified newspaper establishments and grouping of working journalists. The Tribunal has also made grouping of non-working journalist newspapers employees and their wages were separately fixed. It is admitted position that the calligraphists were included in … their wages were separately fixed. It is admitted position that the calligraphists were included in the category of working journalist but the katibs were not included anywhere in the award. Now the question arises as to whether the
Nava Bharat Vs. Nagpur Union of Working Journalists and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-21-1989
Reported in: 1989(3)BomCR81; (1991)ILLJ591Bom
reap the benefit of an award made by the Industrial Tribunal, Nagpur, on 1st January, 1977. These unfortunate Working Journalist have not even received the statutory benefit that has become due and payable under the recommendations of the … Wage Board with effect from 1st July, 1967. Upon enforcement of the recommendations, it was contended that every Working Journalist is entitled to be paid by the employer wages which shall not be less that the rate of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free