Workers Compensation - Judgment Search Results

ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. Vs. Director, Office of Workers' Compensati ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the surviving spouse in predeath settlements section 33 f allows an employer to reduce its compensation obligations under the act by the net amount of damages that the person entitled 260 260 ingalls shipbuilding inc v director office of workers compensation programs to compensation recovers from third parties 33 u s c 933 f if the person entitled to .....

Bath Iron Works Corp. Vs. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Pr ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enacted in 1984 see ingalls shipbuilding v director office of workers compensation programs 898 f 2d 1088 ca5 1990 alabama dry dock and shipbuilding corp v sowell ..... out of the statute congress certainly could have enacted a compensation system that treated retirees differently from current workers in all cases regardless of the nature of the particular occupational disease from which they .....

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Vs. Newport News Sh ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the effective date of the district of columbia workers compensation act 36 d c code ann 36 301 et seq 1981 20 cfr 701 101 ..... party sought appeal see henderson v glens falls indemnity co 134 f 2d 320 322 ca5 1943 there are numerous cases in which the ..... commission order that denied the government recovery of damages for an allegedly unlawful railroad rate the government we said is not less entitled than .....

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs Vs. Greenwich Colli ...

Court: US Supreme Court

..... oubts should be resolved in favor of the disabled miner stomps v director office of workers compensation programs dept of labor 816 f 2d 1533 1534 call 1987 same for a sampling ..... of fact be resolved in favor of the injured employee hansen v director office of workers compensation programs dept of labor 984 f 2d 364 369 calo 1993 true doubt rule applies .....

Douglas MartIn Vs. Workersâandeuro;andtrade; Compensation Board of Al ...

Court: Canada Supreme Court

..... 109 and 111 leave to appeal refused 1998 3 s c r v thomson v workers compensation appeal tribunal 2003 nsca 14 canlii 2003 nsca 14 212 n s r 2d 81 ..... perhaps one does pp 1894 and 1896 38 potential conflicts between the geca and provincial workers compensation legislation were discussed in cape breton development corp v morrison estate 2003 nsca 103 canlii .....

Horlicks Ltd. and anr. Vs. Heinz India (Pvt.) Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 164(2009)DLT539

..... and the application should be dismissed british columbia workers compensation board s case supra the test which governs the stay of proceedings in ..... inconsistent findings and subsequent actions for contribution and indemnity and 2 the tripartite test for granting interim injunctions which includes consideration ..... suits him best if he can get more damages in one than he can in the other then good luck to .....

Metropolitan Stevedore Co. Vs. Rambo

Court: US Supreme Court

..... workers compensation statutes to allow precisely the sort of nominal benefits mechanism that the court approves today see e g cal lab code ann 5802 west 1989 if in any proceeding under this division it is proved that an injury has been suffered but it is not proved that any disability has resulted the appeals board may instead of dismissing the application award a nominal disability indemnity .....

Adams Fruit Co., Inc. Vs. Barrett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such employer to the employee fla stat 440 11 1989 and that respondents receipt of workers compensation benefits therefore precluded them from recovering damages under awpa for the same injuries in support of its position adams fruit maintained that .....

Roberts Vs. Sea-land Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 493 500 1939 california workers compensation statute award s compensation for injuries to an employee see also e g connecticut v doehr 501 u s ..... what i was newly awarded money damages yesterday see tr of oral arg 28 nbsp nbsp nbsp nbsp the inconsistency between the court s interpretation of newly awarded compensation and my reading of the phrase is best illustrated by contextual example assume .....

Estate of Cowart Vs. Nicklos Drilling Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... interpretation before the lhwca was next amended c the longshore and harbor workers compensation act amendments of 1984 98 stat 1639 revisited 33 g id at 1652 the former ..... structure of 33 section 33 f provides that the net amount of damages recovered from any third party for the injuries sustained reduces the compensation owed by the employer so the employer is a real party in interest with respect .....