Wool - Judgment Search Results

Andhra Pradesh Co-operative Wool Spinning Mills Limited and anr. Vs. G ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2003AP418; 2003(3)ALD419; III(2003)BC313

the recovery of an amount of Rs. 3,96,684.42 ps., being the balance of the unpaid price of the wool supplied by the plaintiff to the first appellant herein. The further details of the suit may not be

Everest Wools Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. U.P. Financial Corporation and or ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(1)AWC834(SC); I(2008)BC594(SC); 2008BusLR121(SC); [2008]141CompCas361(SC); 2007(2)CTLJ451(SC); JT2008(1)SC140; 2007(14)SCALE445; 2008(1)SCC643; 2008(2)CivilLJ77; 2008(1)LH(SC)538; (2008)1SCC643

on the questions raised at the bar, we may notice the basic fact of the matter.3. M/s. Everest Wools Pvt. Ltd. of which Pradeep Kumar Agrawal is a Managing Director took loan from the U.P. State Financial

Wool Worth (i) Ltd. Vs. Uoi and Others

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 01.2014 + W.P.(C)874/1998 WOOL WORTH (I) LTD. Through: .... Petitioner None. versus UOI & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

M/S Wool Tex Fabrics Private Limited and Others Vs. M/S Paramount Rubb ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-7894 of 2014 Date of Decision : March 05, 2014 M/s Wool Tex Fabrics Private Limited and others ....Petitioners Versus M/s Paramount Rubber Industries .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN

M/S Wool Tex Fabrics Private Limited and Others Vs. M/S Paramount Rubb ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.M-7869 of 2014 Date of Decision : March 04, 2014 M/s Wool Tex Fabrics Private Limited and others ....Petitioners Versus M/s Paramount Rubber Industries .....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN

Shree Bikaner Wools Vs. Bank of Rajasthan Ltd. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1998Raj197

the disposal of this petition, the relevant facts arc that the petitioner-firm is carrying on the business of wool at Bikaner while Bijay Chand Surana as well as defendant-non-petitioner No. 2 Kamal Kumarare partners of the firm.

Wool Worth (India) Ltd. and anr Vs. Union of India and ors

Court: Delhi

Matched in: Parties Wool Worth (India) Ltd. and anr Vs. Union of India and ors

Satyapal Vs. Wool and Woollen Export Promotion Council and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1987]169ITR507(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Satyapal Vs. Wool and Woollen Export Promotion Council and Another

Nizam Wool Agency Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1992]193ITR318(All); [1992]59TAXMAN187(All)

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal that the applicant has singularly failed to establish the genuineness of the identity of Indian Wool Traders is wholly unsustainable in law, as the said finding is perverse and unreasonable, being contrary relevant material

Orissa Wool Industries and anr. Vs. R.P.F.C. Orissa and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1994)IILLJ1022Ori

Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter 'the Act') has application to the establishment of petitioner No. l, named M/s. Orissa Wool Industries (hereinafter 'the industry')- According to the petitioners, (the second of which is a partner of the industry),