Within Such Period - Judgment Search Results

United India Periodicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissione ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Del)84

being disposed of through this consolidated order.2. The facts in brief are that the assessed-company in the relevant period was engaged in the business of printing and publishing an english weekly 'Link'. It also undertook such printing

United India Periodicals P. Limited Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limi ...

Court: Delhi

be made in writing and published by the arbitrator with six months after entering upon the reference or within such extended time nor exceeding further four months as the sole arbitrator shall by a writing under his own … 1. O.M.P. No. 135 of 1994 has been filed by United India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd. ('UIPL') under Section 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 ('Act') praying for declaration that arbitration clause

Periods 31.10.2013. Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Banker regarding the deposit of the above mentioned cash in the account of the Transferee Company be filed within fortnight from the receipt of the certified copy of this order.11. The Official Liquidator filed his report dated … the Scheme, whereas the Companies have prepared and filed their balance sheet and profit loss account for the period ended Mittal Manju 2014.06.03 12:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh Company Petition

Period of More Than 240 Days. as Noticed Hereinbefore the Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

date with reference to which calculation is to be made, has actually worked under the employer 240 days within a period of one year, he will be deemed to be in continuous service. By reason of the

United India Periodicals Pvt Ltd vs.cmyk Printech Ltd

Court: Delhi

“which is void or voidable under the Indian Contract Act …” shall not be deemed to be lawful within the meaning of the said Rule. In view of the proviso read with the explanation, a Court which … * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1074/2016 & I.A. 8916/2017 UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Ms. Shyel Trehan, Advocate with Mr.Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Advocate. versus CMYK PRINTECH LTD

United India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993(26)DRJ324

any of the terms of the agreement. The amount of royalty was payable by the Uip to Mtnl within ten days of the publication of the directory each year. The original agreement also had an annexure which … to 1.12.92 and also that the extension of this guarantee will be provided for by the bank for such period beyond the said date i.e. 1.12.92 as the Mtnl may feel necessary in this behalf provided further that

United India Periodicals Vs. Central Bank of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)1113; 70(1997)DLT786; 1997(43)DRJ782

if not already filed and to make available their correct copies, if already not supplied to the defendants, within two weeks from today. Application is disposed of accordingly.(8) Written statement be filed by the defendants within four

Newspapers and Periodicals Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1981(2)KarLJ577; (1982)ILLJ189Kant

made in that behalf. It the Legislature had intended that the enquiry authorised under S. 17 should include within its compass the examination of the merits of the employee's claim against his employer and a decision on … the petitioners which according to him, they were liable to pay towards his wages and bonus for the period from 9-7-1971 to 31-12-1979. 3. In these petitions, filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the

United India Periodicals (P.) Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1994)49ITD686(Delhi)

being disposed of through this consolidated order.2. The facts in brief are that the assessee-company in the relevant period was engaged in the business of printing and publishing an English weekly "Link". It also undertook such printing

Cmyk Printech Ltd. Vs.united India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Mr. Ratnakar Dass, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rakesh Kumar and Mr. Anil Kumar Sahu, Advs. versus UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT. LTD. Shyel Through Ms. ..... Respondent Trehan Ms.Sugandha Batra, Advs. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA