Within Such Period - Judgment Search Results

Period of More Than 240 Days. as Noticed Hereinbefore the Vs. State of ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... be made has actually worked under the employer 240 days within a period of one year he will be deemed to be in ..... who claimed to have worked with the appellant for such a long period would not possess any documentary evidence to sailesh ranjan ..... notwithstanding the intentional non production other circumstances may exist upon which such intentional non production may be found to be justifiable on .....

Periods 31.10.2013. Vs. Unknown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... and filed their balance sheet and profit loss account for the period ended 31 03 2013 under the companies act 1956 with the ..... mentioned cash in the account of the transferee company be filed within fortnight from the receipt of the certified copy of this order ..... affidavit about abnormal cash in hand it is submitted that keeping such abnormal cash in hand in the office without any justification in .....

United India Periodicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissione ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Del)84

in brief are that the assessed company in the relevant period was engaged in the business of printing and publishing an

United India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Bank of Baroda and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993(26)DRJ324

..... extension of this guarantee will be provided for by the bank for such period beyond the said date i e 1 12 92 as the mtnl ..... to print and publish 13 main issues of delhi and bombay directories within a period of seven years including 1991 and to pay rs 10 crores ..... uip still failed to pay the royalty and interest as accrued thereupon within 20 days of the publication of the directory this amount was to .....

United India Periodicals P. Limited Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limi ...

Court: Delhi

..... writing and published by the arbitrator with six months after entering upon the reference or within such extended time nor exceeding further four months as the sole arbitrator shall by a writing ..... and mtnl would assist the said companies by rendering certain financial assistance and extending the period of such printing as recorded herein i e bombay 2nd issue as per annexure i and .....

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. M/S United India Periodicals ...

Court: Delhi

..... determine whether the workmen are entitled to wages for the lock out period with effect from june 14 1996 such an adjudication could not take place there is nothing on record that ..... workmen during the illegal and or unjustified strike lock out does not amount to wages within the meaning of the expression as defined in section 2 rr of the act 19 .....

Newspapers and Periodicals Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1981(2)KarLJ577; (1982)ILLJ189Kant

..... intended that the enquiry authorised under s 17 should include within its compass the examination of the merits of the employee ..... publication of newspapers and periodicals or other publications if the state government were to be satisfied that such action was necessary for ..... of parliament regulated by the constitution and the laws comes within this gravitational orbit the most valuable right in a .....

Petitioners Rate of Maintenance Periods Vs. Trishala and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

f of 2013 o m 2 petitioners rate of maintenance periods petitioners no 2 and rs 1500 per month from the

United India Periodicals Pvt Ltd vs.cmyk Printech Ltd

Court: Delhi

..... has by his words or conduct induced such third persons to believe that such acts and obligations were within the scope of the agent s ..... delhi cs comm 1074 2016 i a 8916 2017 united india periodicals pvt ltd plaintiff through ms shyel trehan advocate with mr nikhil ..... june 2 2015 mr shashank bhagat chairman managing director united india periodicals pvt ltd dear mr bhagat this is how we propose to .....

Cmyk Printech Ltd. Vs.united India Periodicals Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

18 04 2015 the relationship between the parties for the period prior to 01 04 2011 is not relevant to be