Wild Life Protection Amendment Act 2002 Section 15 - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association and Other Vs. Union o ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi267b; ILR1997Delhi22

and the convention of international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora to which india is a party yet the expert advice given by the national board of wild life i am particularly happy that plants have been included in xx xx xx18 the amendments effected by the wild life protection amendment act 1991 in the principal act which the petitioners in order to appreciate the necessity to carry out the amendments in the principal act it would be advantageous to have xx18 the amendments effected by the wild life protection amendment act 1991 in the principal act which the petitioners challenge read 39 in section 39 of the principal act in sub section 1 the a b after clause b the following clauses already seen the tusker population has dropped to a mere 1500 when precepts lose their efficacy and are violated legislation steps

G.R. Simon Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi301; 1997(41)DRJ604; (1997)117PLR66

amendment act of 1986 vide chapter va as well as wild life protection amendment act 1991 the said judgment has traced based on the recommendations of the indian board for wild life comprising eminent environmentalists conservationists scientists and important public representatives as contended that the amendment in the schedules of wild life protection act 1972 was not the first one but was the and animal parks where no hunting was permitted and the amendments in the schedule of wild life protection act there has life protection amendment act of 1986 the government of india acting under section 61 of the wild life act of 1972 expiry of the stipulated period it becomes an offence under section 49 c 7 of the wild life protection amendment act wild life act of 1972 issued a notification no 1 15 86 wl 1 50 859 e dated 24 11 1986

Shyam Sunder Sharma Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 70(1997)DLT401

relate to clause c of new section 55 substituted in wild life protection amendment act 1972 53 1972 in place of into india was brought under the provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 in short referred to as the act as well and accordingly the parliament passed the wild life protection amendment bill 1991 which received the assent of the president well and accordingly the parliament passed the wild life protection amendment bill 1991 which received the assent of the president of life protection act 1972 in short referred to as the act and in accordance with the provisions of section 44 of from today onwards i e in making an application under section 49 c within a period of thirty days from today

Halar Utkarsh Samiti Through Prakash H. Doshi Vs. State of Gujarat Thr ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2001)2GLR964

for the purposes of such sanctuary to ensure security of wild animals in the sanctuary and the preservation of the sanctuary of 1993 the relevant rules with regard to the wild life are as under 1 the wild life transactions and taxidermy was granted even before the commencement of the wild life protection act the other one is of gujarat state fertilizer corpn which the indian society has throughout cherished through the 42nd amendment i e the constitution forty second amendment act 1976 art r l by way of public interest litigation challenging the action proposed action on the part of the respondents allowing setting extent of saying that on the question of interpretation of section 29 the matter was res judicata or res integra and through the marine sanctuary under the conditions nos 1 to 15 as mentioned in the body of this authorisation order issued

State of Kerala Vs. The Secretary,paramekkara Devaswam

Court : Kerala

..... wild life protection amendment act 2002 shall not be proceeded with all pending proceedings shall stand abated 3 any captive animal animal article trophy or wa 1650 14 connected cases36uncured trophy declared under sub section ..... animal articles etc 15 there were further amendments by act 44 of 1991 and act 26 of 1993 and then came the next important amendment made in the act by act 16 of 2013 .....

Kamla Kant Pandey Vs. Prabhagiya Van Adhikari and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All136; 2005(1)AWC877

..... this judgment keeping in view the provisions of the wild life protection act section 29 in its amended form would apply with full force to the existing ..... and t n gondavarman thirumalpad v union of india and ors 2002 7 supreme 620 21 apart from the said decisions the ..... the petitioner to the show cause notice issued in this regard 15 shri dinesh dwivedi learned senior counsel has further urged that .....

ivory Traders and Manufacturers Association Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)333; 2(1997)CLT273; 67(1997)DLT145; 1997(42)DRJ131

to co exist with nature and to preserve and protect wild life 51 as already seen the directive principles of state do not permit the collection of snake venom for predicting life saving drugs from snake like cobra and russel s viper of six months from the commencement of the wild life protection amendment act 1991 49 b prohibition of dealing in trophies relevant objects and reasons of the principal act and the amendment acts of 1986 and 1991 for the better understanding of to be ivory at all for the purposes of the act the petitioners however do not deny that mammoth ivory is reliefs the petition was dismissed and it was held that sections 366 367 c and 385 of the act were enacted 1985 16560 21361 1989 17065 23270 1990 15500 17500 1991 15000 20000 1992 20000 1993 22796 28348 22 according to the

Indian Handicrafts Emporium and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC3240; 2003(5)ALD39(SC); 106(2003)DLT350(SC); JT2003(7)SC446; 2003(6)SCALE831; (2003)7SCC589

..... action taken or purported to be taken for violation of section 40 of this act at any time before the commencement of the wild life protection amendment act 2002 shall not be proceeded with all pending proceedings shall ..... of ahmedabad and ors v jan mohammed usmanbhai and anr 1986 2scr700 this court held 15 before proceeding to deal with the points urged on behalf of the appellants it will .....

Cottage Industries Exposition Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2007(122)ECC7; 2007(148)LC7(Delhi); 2009(235)ELT60(Del)

..... the wild life protection amendment bill 2002 proproses i to highlight the ecological and environmental objective in the long title of the wild life act ii to add new definitions in view of the amendments proposed in the wild life act iii .....

Consumer Education and Research Society, Ahmedabad and Etc. Vs. Union ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1995Guj133; (1995)2GLR1655

of villages and boundaries thereof which are included in the wild life sanctuary in the said taluka of lakhpat 3 the significance for the purpose of protecting propagating or developing wild life or its environment is to be included in a sanctuary then inter alia defines the word sanctuary the wild life protection act 1972 contains various provisions applicable to sanctuaries like section any area was included in a sanctuary 12 two important amendments which were made in the act were the substitution of public injury to put the judicial machinery in motion like action popularis of roman law whereby any citizen could bring such b patel that the provisions of the newly added sub section 3 of section 26a would not apply to a sanctuary which is declared as one under the unamended section 18 15 section 26a apart from providing for declaration of a sanctuary