Wild Life Protection Amendment Act 2002 Section 15 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection amendment act 2002 section 15 Year: 2015 Page 1 of about 388 results (1.841 seconds)State of Kerala Vs. The Secretary,paramekkara Devaswam
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Mar-31-2015
..... wild life protection amendment act 2002 shall not be proceeded with all pending proceedings shall stand abated 3 any captive animal animal article trophy or wa 1650 14 connected cases36uncured trophy declared under sub section ..... animal articles etc 15 there were further amendments by act 44 of 1991 and act 26 of 1993 and then came the next important amendment made in the act by act 16 of 2013 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiphad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Others Vs. State of Maharasht ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Dec-22-2015
by the aforesaid judgment the latter act which inter alia protects the imposition and collection of the cess on entry of be deemed to have been restored automatically by the later amendment act 8 of 2003 under the circumstances the petitioner submits loss of revenue due to cessation of the sugarcane cess act from that date as both houses of the state legislature 1962 by the maharashtra tax laws levy and amendment act 2002 never came into effect 38 we find substance in the noticed that the petitioners are challenging the vires of amended sections 2 3 and 6 of the act of 1962 they ii of the viith schedule to the constitution of india 15 the commissioner explains that the amounts spent for transport charges
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVimal Haribhau Naik Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through its addition ...
Court : Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on : May-05-2015
..... wild life avowed object of the wild life protection act 1972 is to provide for the protection of wild animals birds and plants and it lays down an elaborate scheme for throwing a protective net around them under section 39 wild ..... dated 05 9 2013 making amendments to g r dated 02 ..... and others reported at air 2002 sc 1334 p 1340 hon ..... it makes an unreasonable classification 15 in the case of baburaoabaji .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegional Deputy Director Vs. Zavaray S. Poonawala and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-26-2015
..... his first application on 27 4 2002 to the regional deputy director wild life protection wlp this application was however rejected ..... it is the chief wildlife warden under the wild life protection act 1972 who was competent authority to grant the ..... 26 3 2015 item no 103 court no 15 section iii s u p r e m e ..... of the item in question respondent no 1 amended the writ petition and included challenge to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHardev Singh Akoi Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-06-2015
meaning in terms of form annexed to the declaration of wild life stock rules 2003 leave alone granting of ownership certificate and place of hearing to be notified the chief wild life warden or the officer authorized by the state government in late father under the amended provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 in short the 1972 act the amended provision which he had acquired via his late father under the amended provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 in short father under the amended provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 in short the 1972 act the amended provision under sought to apply to seek immunity in a sense is section 40a of the 1972 act this provision was introduced by the matter and an order is passed by the respondent 15 consequently the impugned order is set aside the respondent will
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Ramachandra Hebbar and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka, Reptd By Its ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-13-2015
of compensation in respect of acquisition of their lands under wild life protection act 1972 by setting aside the endosement dt 1894 read with section 25 1 d of the wild life protection act 1972 that liberty is to seek enhancement of act read with 25 1 d of the wild life protection act 1972 before the assistant commissioner fourth respondent herein have sub section 3 of section 18 of the act karnataka amendment and seek a direction to the deputy commissioner to make respect of acquisition of their lands under wild life protection act 1972 by setting aside the endosement dt 19 21 5 grievance of the petitioners is that their applications filed under section 18 of the land acquisition act read with 25 1
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-16-2015
constitution like a machine is a lifeless thing it acquires life because of the men who control it and operate it is an extensive reference in sankalchand sheth broadly the constitutional protections and provisions for a judge of the high court are parliament had invoked article 368 while passing the constitution 25th amendment act 1971 by the above amendment a law giving effect separation of powers in one sense is a limit on active jurisdiction of each organ but it has another deeper and of the 1984 anti sikh riots in delhi and the 2002 anti muslim riots in gujarat had not got any justice of india in this behalf reference was also made to sections 11 12 and 13 of the njac act the power 9 scc1 13 2010 5 scc538 14 2007 6 scc586 15 2012 13 scc497 16 2010 4 scc595 17 1993 supp
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Dec-03-2015
..... protected areas i e area notified under section 18 26 a or 35 of the wild life protection act 1972 for undertaking 364 activities related to protection ..... amendment act of 1989 namely act 10 of 1989 which inter alia amended section 98 a of the act ..... in the national interest section 15 of the mmdr act empowers the state ..... containing recommendations on 09 08 2002 the report contained the following .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-14-2015
..... act 1959 for short the 1959 act was enacted to amend the law relating to publication of obscene matters provided for the protection of literature and to strengthen the law concerning pornography section ..... various facets of life of gandhi and gandhian ..... comme concept juridique 2002 journal des tribunaux pp ..... directors do practise oscar wilde s observation moderation ..... ct at 999 15 although we are not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Greatship (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax Mumbai-I a ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-28-2015
united states v wigglesworth 2 story 369 374 mutual benefit life ins co v herold 198 f 199 201 aff d 80 of 1976 the central government hereby makes the following amendments in the government of india in the ministry of finance the apex court while construing the provisions of maritime zones act has held that insofar as the territorial waters are concerned below notification no 1 2002 service tax dated 1 3 2002 hereinafter referred to as the 2002 notification in exercise intention of the legislature by making a distinction between sub section 1 and sub section 2 of section 20 of the the gazette of india extraordinary vide number g s r 153 e dated the 1st march 2002 namely in the said
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT