Wild Life Protection Amendment Act 2002 Section 15 - Judgment Search Results

Birendra Mohan Gouda Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2006(II)OLR654

vehicle seized for alleged commission of an offence under the wild life protection amendment act 2002 hereinafter referred to as the seized for alleged commission of an offence under the wild life protection amendment act 2002 hereinafter referred to as the act find any hesitation to come to the conclusion that for protection of the value of a property seized it would be alleged commission of an offence under the wild life protection amendment act 2002 hereinafter referred to as the act can be crpc on the ground that section 39 d of the act is a bar for that 4 mr mishra learned addl of an offence under the wild life protection amendment act 2002 hereinafter referred to as the act can be released in the petitioner under section 457 crpc on the ground that section 39 d of the act is a bar for that

Principal Chief Conservator of Forest and anr. Vs. Sachala Majhi

Court : Orissa

Reported in : II(2005)ACC695; 2006ACJ1428; [2005(105)FLR47]; 2005(I)OLR137

forest guard is to see that the provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 and rules framed thereunder are observed guard is to see that the provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 and rules framed thereunder are observed and is to see that the provisions of the wild life protection act 1972 and rules framed thereunder are observed and to the petition filed claiming compensation was not maintainable 6 after amendment of the act the word forestry has been inserted as informed the range officer about the seizure and for necessary action and went back to tuluka beat along with the apr has been allowed to draw family pension till 31 10 2002 apart from the above eldest son of the deceased has or circulars or instructions nor can they replace statutory rules 156 of 2003 has been filed by the claimant for enhancement

Sri Prabhudayal Agrawalla Vs. Orissa Sales Tax Tribunal and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 73(1992)CLT171; 1991(II)OLR464; [1993]88STC473(Orissa)

that the substance of the transaction the dominant object the life style and other telling factors must determine whether the apparent assessee to establish so as to bring itself within the protection of the exemption that during the period for which exemption with validation and exemption section 6 1 a of the amendment act prescribed that wherever the expression tax on the sale v sales tax officer 1988 70 stc 153 the amendment act was considered by this court after construing the provisions it provision in the act 1972 or the act 1951 air 2002 orissa 130 overruled where the attendance of the assessee is by virtue of the provision in section 56 read with section 64 2 of the act 1972 the action taken for in piplani sweets v sales tax officer 1988 70 stc 153 the amendment act was considered by this court after construing

Mrs.Rutuparna Mohanty and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

deemed to be an integral component of the right to life it is also relevant to extract the observation made by to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of india this has and urban poverty alleviation have been included after the constitutional amendment the aforesaid constitutional amendment must be read along with article urban life separate corporation law namely the orissa municipal corporation act 2003 was enacted comprising various chapters including chapter 21 under and the programme of house building for the economically weaker sections must not remain a dead letter as such schemes and such relief may be given even beyond the period of 15 days laid down in the preceding sub section only after

Kishore Chandra Patel and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1993Ori259; 76(1993)CLT720

in public life calling for new value orientation in our life and in our culture public interest demands that such offenders are not hit by article 20 2 93 denial of protection of article 20 3 the next fundamental right which is confined to the offences committed during the last ten years amendment of the act was contemplated on 27 8 1992 the section 16 which applies to all the proceedings under the act would even operate during trial a strong submission is advanced take cognizance of the cases specified in the act 5 section 5 of the act without the words and that the satisfied that the provisions finding place in sections 13 to 15 of chapter iii are fair just and reasonable and take

Prafulla Kumar Samal Vs. Union of India

Court : Orissa

disablement with which he will spend the rest of his life that is all that is admissible to him under law the appellant is that he was a constable in railway protection force on receiving a command certificate from the a s the proposition that if any benefit is conferred by the amendment of the rule keeping in view the scheme of the scheme of the act it clearly shows that the aforesaid act is a beneficial piece of legislation and law is well the case of kalpataru agroforest enterprises v union of india 2002 3 scc 69 that review cannot be allowed on the 1 a of the railway claims tribunal act read with section 152 of the c p c for correction of the a of the railway claims tribunal act read with section 152 of the c p c for correction of the typographical

M/S. Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Orissa ...

Court : Orissa

not been licensed to supply energy in terms of 1998 amendment act it cannot claim as a licensee as regards the act the aforesaid definition of licensee was thereafter amended by act 15 of 1998 and after amendment it reads as follows imposed furthermore the petitioners being not consumers as defined in section 2 c of the act they are not liable to was set aside by the apex court and in paragraph 15 of their judgment the apex court recorded the finding that

Gopinath Jiew and ors. Vs. the Comr. of Hindu Religious Endowments and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori339

if the ct is deprived of his power of giving protection to an aggrieved party by such interlocutory orders as an suit having been stayed under schedule orissa hindu religious endowments amendment act orissa act xxxi 31 of 1947 the ct has of sub section 2 of schedule 4 of the said act shall be stayed lor a period of two years from upon sub section l is the only admissible one sub section a is an enabling pro vision empowering the provincial govt

Hari Hara Singh Vs. Harihar Patnaik and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1954Ori101; 19(1953)CLT491

to claim protection under the provisions of the orissa tenants protection act 3 the state of khandapara was one of the act 1950 act 4 of 1950 and orissa tenants protection amendment act 1951 orissa act 17 of 1951 justify this interpretation on 24 12 1947 the extra provincial jurisdiction act 1947 act 47 of 1947 was passed by the central legislature empowering unless other requirements are complied with the provision of sub section 1 of section 173 permits filing of an appeal against assess at rs 100 one hundred rupees only mohapatra j 15 i agree motor vehicles act 1988 c a no 59

Executive Engineer(Electrical)southco, Phulbani and Vs. Smt. R. Wara L ...

Court : Orissa

observed that the claimants are entitled to the benefit of amendment raising quantum of compensation therefore the commissioner has rightly applied order this court further held that the commissioner under the act was fully justified in making the order for payment of case of m parameswaran pillai vs union of india another 2002 2 t a c 359 sc the commissioner accepted the 8 000 per month as per the amendment brought to section 4 w e f 31 05 2010 i e two after clarifying the law as noticed above underlined for emphasis 15 rathi menon s case supra which has been followed by