Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 18 declaration of sanctuary Court: andhra pradesh Page 2 of about 589 results (0.508 seconds)

Sep 29 1978 (HC)

Krishna Murthy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979AP85

Sambasiva Rao, C.J. 1. Quite a large number of creditors in the rural areas in the State of Andhra Pradesh are challenging in these writ petitions the validity of the Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Indebtedness (Relief) Act. 1977 (Act No. 7 of 1977) hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. After the Legislature of Andhra Pradesh Passed it, the Governor of the State reserved it for the assent of the President of India on the 15th of April. 1977 and it was given by the President on the 29th of April, 1977. The Act was intended 'to provide relief from indebtedness to agricultural labourers, rural l artisans and small farmers in the State of Andhra Pradesh and for matters connected therewith.'2. The indictment of the Act is by way of challenging the validity of Sections 3 (i) 3( t), 4 (1), 4 (2) (b), 5 (1), 5 (4), 6 (4) and 13. Sri Babulu Reddy who mounted the main attack on behalf of the petitioners, maintained that these provisions offend Art. 14 and cls. (f) and (g) of Art. 19(1). He further ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 2015 (HC)

M. Viswanathan Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... village namakkal district, tamilnadu state, was involved in as many as in 6 (six) cases. the above cases were registered against him, under the provisions of section 20(1) (ii) (iii) (iv) and (x) of a.p. forest act, and also under section 29 of wild life protection act, 1972 and 55(2) of biological diversity act, 2002 and section 307, 353, 378 and 379 ipc. the details shows that he is a habitual offender. he is committed a series of forest offences by entering government reserve forests without proper authorisation, serving standing ..... .32/2015 u/s. 353, 307, 379, 120-b r/w 34 ipc; section 20 (1)(c), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (x) of a.p. forest act, 1967; section 29 of the wild life protection act, 1972; sections 55(2), 58 of the biological diversity act, 2002 and section 30 of the arms act, 1959. the incident occurred on 30.03.2015 at about 5.00 a.m. the detenu along with 12 others committed similar offence. (e) sr puram ps .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2015 (HC)

P. Surendra Vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Chief Secret ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... park or destroying, damaging, diverting the habitat of any wild animal by any act what so ever is an offence as per wild life (protection) act, 1972. the forests in s.v.sanctuary abound in an important endangered and endemic species called red sanders scientifically known as pterocarpussantalinus'. the ..... tirumala hills were declared as sri venkateswara wild life sanctuary vide go.ms.no.59 efsandt (for-iii) dept., dt.: 13.05.1998. within the above sanctuary an area of 353.63 sq.kms. is declared as sri venkateswara national park vide go.ms.no.58 efs and t (for-iii) dept., dt: 13.05.1998 under wild life (protection) ct, 1972. all acts such as destroying, exploiting or removing any wild life including forest produce from a sanctuary / national .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2001 (HC)

Madireddy Padma Rambabu and ors. Vs. District Forest Officer, Kakinada ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD728; 2002(3)ALT57

..... being. article 48-a of the constitution which is by way of directive principle of state policy under part iv directs the state to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild life of the country. article 51a(g) imposes a duty on every citizen of india to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life and to have compassion for living creatures. though part iii of the constitution does not contain any provision to provide right ..... part iv and article 51-a(g) in part iv-a of the constitution is that the state is under a constitutional obligation to ensure the enforcement of the citizens right to pollution free environment under the existing legislations like the environmental protection act and the coastal zone regulations.42. the apex court in s. jagannadh's case (supra) directed: 5. the farmers who are operating traditional and improved traditional systems of aquaculture may adopt improved technology for increased .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2015 (HC)

V. Muthuvelu Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... on 23.09.2014 for the offences under sections 307, 353, 379 r/w.34 of ipc, sec.20(i)(c)(x) of a.p.forest act, 1967, rule 3 of a.p.red sanders transit rules 1969 and rule (3) of a.p.red sander wood possession rules, 1989 and sec.51 of wild life protection act, 1967. 5. crime no.149/2014 of srikalahasti rural p.s., registered on 25.09.2014 for the offences under sections 307, 353, 379 ..... p.s., registered on 21.09.2014 for the offences under section 379 of ipc, sec.20(1)(c)(x) of a.p.forest act, 1967, rule (3) of a.p.sandal wood and red sanders wood transit rules, 1969, sec.3 of a.p.red sandal wood possession rules 1989 and sec.51 of wild life protection act, 1967. 3. crime no.271/2014 of alipiri p.s., registered on 23.09.2014 for the offences under section 379 of ipc, sec .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2000 (HC)

intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi Vs. State of A.P. and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD435; 2000(6)ALT98

..... 51-a envisages fundamental duties of the citizens of india. clause (g) thereof says that it shall be the duty of every citizen of india to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life, and to have a compassion for living creatures. no doubt, it is the duty of every citizen to protect the environment. here, no citizen is violating the fundamental duty. it is the respondent-state, in the general interest of the public, for creating a good ..... facts of the case on hand. that was a case taken up suo motu by the supreme court, on the basis of a news hem appearing in 'indian express daily' regarding falling groundwater level in delhi city, under the environment (protection) act, 1986. the supreme court gave certain directions regarding the immediate steps to be taken for regulating indiscriminate digging of bore wells and withdrawal of underground water in the country. the central government was directed to constitute a central groundwater board .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

The State of A.P. Rep. by the Public Pro Vs. Kollam Gangi Red

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... .05.2014. the crime registered for the offences punishable under sections 379, 120-b ipc, section 20(1)(3), 10, 29, (1)(2)(b) of indian forest act and rule3 of red sandal wood possession and transit rules and sections 27, 29, 31 and 51 of wild life protection act against 16 out of 35 accused. 2) thus, from the above, leave about other accused, the main accusation against the respondent-k.gangi reddy that he was arrested on 05.04. ..... made her to surrender. there is every likelihood of her again fleeing, if she continuous to be on bail. further, if amarmani alone is denied bail, the threatening of witnesses will be taken over by madhumani. 8) the object underlying the cancellation of bail is to protect the fair trial and secure justice being done to the society by preventing the accused who is set at liberty by the bail order from tampering with the evidence in the heinous crime. . . . it hardly requires to be stated that once a person is released on bail in serious criminal cases where .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 2013 (TRI)

M/S. Axis Bank, Rep. by Its Asst. Vice President Cum Gpa Vs. Mrs. Sara ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Incharge President) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint sought for the statement of account in respect of hypothecation , certified copy of the hypothecation loan agreement, Rs.50,000/- towards compensation, Rs.50,000/- towards compensation for not providing the statement of account . The respondent purchased TATA 2515 truck bearing registration number AP 29 T 8687 on hire purchase agreement with the appellant through Shriram Transport Finance Company. The respondent availed the loan from the appellant, an amount of Rs.9,75,000/- which is repayable in 57 installments @ Rs.21,595/- commencing from 1.12.2005. The appellants agent generated incorrect statement of account of the respondent and the respondent got issued notice dated 8.08.2011 requesting for issuing of the statement of account and filed the complaint stating that failure of the appellant to provide statement of account amounts to deficiency in service. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2003 (HC)

Sree Rayalaseema Alkalies and Allied Chemicals Limited Vs. A.P. State ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(6)ALD819; 2003(5)ALT323

ORDERD.S.R. Varma, J.1. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to bill the petitioner for the power supplied, according to H.T. Category-I tariff, giving the 25 percent rebate, which is granted to new industries.2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner is a public limited company having the unit at Gondiparla Village of Kurnool District, involved in the production of caustic soda. As per the scheme available, the petitioner-company opted to be categorized under Category-I and applied to the respondent-A.P. State Electricity Board (presently known as 'A.P, Transmission Corporation. Hence, hereinafter referred to 'the Corporation') for supply of H.T. power initially at 20 M.V.A. in the year 1981. The availability of the power was confirmed by the Corporation and directed the petitioner to comply with certain formalities. The petitioner also made an application in this regard. Subsequently, several other changes in the policy of the Corporation had taken pl...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1998 (HC)

Chief Secretary to Government of A.P., Gad and Others Vs. P.K. JaIn an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD722; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)629; 1998(5)ALT339

..... charges under sub-section (4), disposal of cattle would be the only expedient course. at the time when that provision was made, the framers of the act would not have visualised that voluntary and charitable organisations will come forward to take delivery of such cattle and maintain them. the degree of awareness and consciousness that arose in post-independence days for the protection of animal life and preservation of wild life was not felt so much in the by-gone days. the laws which we have now for preventing cow slaughter and promotion of animal preservation were .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //