Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Nov-29-2013
..... respondent cannot be considered as consideration and the service rendered by the appellant is not a service within the meaning of section 2(1)(o) of the consumer protection act. the national commission held 11. counsel for the revision petitioner has relied upon the decision of this commission in the mayor, calcutta municipal corporation vs. tarapada chatterjee ..... no.2 and 3 within the ambit of section 2(1) (d) and (o) of the consumer protection act as under: 13. para 17 in the complaint states that complainant society is the consumer within the meaning of consumer protection act as it has hired the services of respondent for consideration . para 20, listing the reliefs sought, claims ..... provide facilities in the gram panachayat administration. in exercise of the powers and functions conferred u/s 44(4) and 5 (c) of a.p.gram panchayat act, 1994 and go ms.no.70 pr and rd rule dated 29.2.2000 the district panchayat officer, srikakulam shall exercise over all supervision in the district .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Nov-12-2013
..... any notice to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant. the procedure contemplated under civil procedure code does not apply to the proceedings under the consumer protection act for ordering notice before resolving the issue. the matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, etc. 3. the point for consideration ..... filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... oral order: (r. lakshminarsimha rao, member) 1. this is an appeal preferred by m/s kotak mahindra old mutual life insurance ltd., against the order of the district forum u/s 15 of c.p.act along with it an application f.a.i.a.no.2773 of 2013 to condone delay of 131 days on the ground .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Mar-18-2013
..... in cc no. 130/2010 on the file of district forum, kurnool the opposite party insurance company preferred this appeal u/s 15 of the consumer protection act. 2) the brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants husband latemarabuyani maddaiah obtained group janata personal accident insurance policy from the ..... 2011 dt. 20.9.2011 issued by insurance regulatory and development authority pertaining to delay in claim intimation/documents submission with respect to: all life insurance contracts and all non-life individual and group insurance contracts. it reads as follows : image it is very clear from the above that the insurance company cannot repudiate ..... of the opinion that this claim falls under the category of accidental death and that this complaint is filed within the period of limitation under the consumer protection act reckoned from the date of repudiation. in the light of the above discussion, we are of the opinion that the dist. forum rightly allowed the complaint .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Aug-20-2013
..... deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly belated ..... to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant in regard to her plea. the provisions of civil procedure code or provisions of limitation act do not apply to the proceedings under the consumer protection act to order notice before resolving the issue. the matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, and good conscience etc. 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Jul-05-2013
..... deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly belated ..... to the respondent as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant in regard to her plea. the provisions of civil procedure code or provisions of limitation act do not apply to the proceedings under the consumer protection act to order notice before resolving the issue. the matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, and good conscience etc. 3 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Jul-01-2013
..... in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was ..... as no improvement could be made by the petitioner/appellant in regard to its plea. the provisions of civil procedure code or provisions of limitation act do not apply to the proceedings under the consumer protection act to order notice before resolving the issue. the matters have to be resolved by applying principles of natural justice, equity, etc. ..... company remains liable towards third party claims but the transferee cannot get any personal benefit under the policy unless there is a compliance of the provisions of the act. 7) the national commission in madan singh vs. united india insurance co. ltd. and anr. 1 (2009) cpj 158 (nc), after considering the entire .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
..... , the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... agarawal vs. new okhla industrial development authority reported in iv (2011) cpj 63 (sc) the honble supreme court stressed the need to consider the object in consumer protection act while deciding application how to condone delay and held that: it is also apposite to observe that while deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay ..... 6,85,000/- with interest, compensation of `5,000/- and costs of `2,000/- along with it filed the above application u/s 15 of the consumer protection act to condone delay of 353 days. 2. it is averred in the petition that the dist. forum has erroneously directed it to pay the amount with interest, compensation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Feb-13-2013
..... scheme. there is no deficiency on the part of the opposite party. the dispute raised by the complainant does not pertain to any service within the meaning of consumer protection act. the opposite party also filed a writ petition in w.p. no.27018/2011 against the order of the district forum this forum and it was admitted on ..... response. there was no response from the opposite party. hence the complaint. 7. the opposite party resisted the case contending that dr. t.v.s. ramakrishna was a life member of indian medical association and joined in the family benefit scheme (fbs for brevity) and appointed usha rani the complainant as his nominee. contribution amount depends on the ..... the case as seen from the complaint are that the complainant is the wife of dr. t.v.s. ramakrishna who used to reside machilipatnam. he was a life member of indian medical association, a.p. state branch. the medical association had introduced a family benefit scheme for its members and dr.ramakrishna became a member of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Nov-14-2013
..... application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way and sufficient cause should be made .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on : Nov-13-2013
..... application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way and sufficient cause should be made .....
Tag this Judgment!