Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 18 declaration of sanctuary Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.232 seconds)

Kunapuraju Rangaraju Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD802; 1998(3)ALT215

..... g.o.ms. no.76 environment, forest, science and technology (forest iii) department, dated 25-9-1995 under section 18 of the wild life protection act (for short 'the act') and whether the petitioners could be prohibited from carrying on pisciculture in the lands owned or occupied by them till final notification under section 26a ..... pradesh with effect from 5-8-1973. the prime object of the enactment is for the protection of wild animals and birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental ..... the preliminary notification was already issued under section 18 of the act. therefore, by virtue of the interim orders the petitioners who are pattedars of the lands are being permitted to continue their fishing operations.5. the parliament enacted the wild life (protection) act, 1972, which came into force in the state of andhra .....

Chief Secretary to Government of A.P., Gad and Others Vs. P.K. JaIn an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD722; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)629; 1998(5)ALT339

..... made, the framers of the act would not have visualised that voluntary and charitable organisations will come forward to take delivery of such cattle and maintain them. the degree of awareness and consciousness that arose in post-independence days for the protection of animal life and preservation of wild life was not felt so much in ..... first respondent, as indicated above, could frame necessary scheme meeting the requirements in tune with the a.p. prohibition of the cow slaughter and animals preservation act and the prevention of cruelty ..... a.p. prohibition of cow slaughter and animal preservation act. the plea of the writ petitioners found its acceptance by the learned single judge who gave the following directions:'the entire scheme as to the detention and protection of the stray animals, keeping in view, the request made by the petitioner-organisations, the .....

Society for Preservation of Environment and Quality of Life (Speql) Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALT516

..... this hazardous waste and there is existing a statutory recognition to that effect: the hazardous wastes (management and handling) rules of 1989 notified under the environment (protection) act, 1986 detail out eighteen categories of hazardous waste along with the regulatory methods. various safeguards have been incorporated in the rules for handling and transportation of ..... the president of the himalayan wild life and environment preservation society, the said organisations may be big or small, may be well-established ones or recently started ones - that is immaterial. once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting the interests of shankar trading ..... company, there was no reason to hold that he was not acting bonafide in approaching the court to preserve the forest wealth of the state .....

Mittakola Venkata Rama Rao Vs. Sarpanch, Grampanchayath, Mahaboobabad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD343; 1998(6)ALT440

..... (protection) act (act no.29 of 1986) for the purpose of protecting and improving our environment. it widely distributed powers on all those who are traditionally classified as not aggrieved persons to take environmental disputes to courts. this is clearly in harmony with out constitutional goals which not only mandate the state to protect and improve the environment and to safeguard the forests and wild-life of ..... which also hold it to be the duty of every one of our citizens to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild-life and to have compassion for living creatures (article 51-a(g)). 24. from the above it is clear that protection of the environment is not only the duty of the citizen but it is also the .....

Xl Telecom Ltd., Hyderabad Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise, Hyder ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD230; 1998(2)ALT722; 1999(105)ELT263(AP)

..... lay several cables of different lengths andconnect the cables. the object of such connection is to ensure continuity of the individual pairs of wires to provide protective covering to the cable joint to fill inert material inside the cable joint. ultimately a joint emerges by joining of cables which is a part of cable ..... under section 2(f). it is an inclusive definition. it includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product therefore, under the act excise duty is leviable on goods manufactured which includes any process which is incidental or ancillary. in putting duty paid bought out and manufactured items in one ..... constitution of india. the quasi-judicial authorises are not bound by the circulars issued by the cenlral board of excise and customs under section 37b of the act. therefore, the apprehension of the petitioners that the appellate authority would decide that the activity involved in cable jointing kits amounts to manufacture, is baseless. it .....

S. Shyamprasad Rao Vs. Union Govt. of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALD349; 1998(6)ALT121

..... he is also the president of the himalayan wild life and environment preservation society. the said organisations may be big or small, may be well-established ones or recently started ones - that is immaterial. once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting the interests of shankar trading company, there ..... was no reason to hold that he was not acting hona fide in approaching the court to preserve the forest wealth of the state in the ..... court in no uncertain terms held that once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting the interests of any particular community, there is no reason to hold that the petitioner was not acting bona fide in approaching the court. the issue, therefore, arises as to whether he .....

Prof. M.V. Nayudu (Retd.) Vs. Secretary to Govt. of A.P., Ma and Ud De ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD688

..... hazardous waste and there is existing a statutory recognition to that effect: the hazardous wastes (management and handling) rules of 1989 notified under the environment (protection) act, 1986 details out eighteen categories of hazardous waste alongwith the regulatory methods. various safeguards have been incorporated in the rules for handling and transportation of hazardous ..... the president of the himalayan wild life and environment preservation society. the said organisations may be big or small, may be well-established ones or recently started ones - that is immaterial. once it is found that he was not acting at the instance of or at the behest of or for protecting theinterests of shankar trading ..... company, there was no reason to hold that he was not acting bonafide in approaching the court to preserve the forest wealth of the state .....

M. Vijaya Lakshmi Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and Another

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... is not a case of deficiency in service either in terms of the law or in terms of the contract as defined in section 2(1)(g) of the consumer protection act, 1986." this decision of the supreme court governs the facts of the present case even assuming that the provisions in the policy issued relating to accident benefit were not deleted ..... case admittedly m. arvind kumar was a minor at the time when the policy was issued and no policy could be issued by any one of the officials of the life insurance corporation (lic) in the case of a minor covering accident benefit. the learned counsel for the appellant/complainant sought to rely upon a circular issued by the lic. that .....

Sarwotham Ispat Limited and anr. Vs. Government of India, Ministry of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(6)ALT15; 1999(105)ELT550(AP)

..... grievance of the petitioners that recently the central government has changed its policy with regard to excise duty and issued a notification under section 3-a of the central excise act, 1944 which empowers the central government to levy excise duty on such goods as may be notified on the basis of the annual capacity of the production of the factory ..... reached since power is chief raw material and has a major impact on the production of mild steel ingots.4. it is at this juncture, section 3-a of the act is apt to be noted. section 3-a reads as follows :section 3-a: power of central government to charge excise duty on the basis of capacity of production in ..... determined, the writ petitioners would be at liberty to approach the commissioner of central excise in terms of the provisions in sub-section (4) of section 3-a of the act. this is, however, subject to the availability of the relief in terms of the rules framed under sections 3 and 3-a of the .....

Giridharilal Chawla Vs. Corporation Bank

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... which the banks chose to levy for providing their services were in the realm of pricing and mat the same were beyond the jurisdiction of the tribunals under the consumer protection act, 1986 and that whenever the locker rents were increased the respondent had put up the increased rates etc., on the notice board situated in the bank premises. he further stated .....