Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 18 declaration of sanctuary Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 259 results (0.156 seconds)

Dr. T. Patanjali Sastry, President, Environment Centre Vs. Chairman, A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT315

..... habitations and their maintenances by providing sufficient number of vents for the roads existing at the time of notification of kolleru wild life sanctuary u/s 18 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 without permitting new roads and culverts;(7) right to maintain existing water courses and drains necessary to avert submersion ..... of notification, fishing in traditional method is permitted without causing environment hazard till the government acquires such private lands under the provisions of the wild life protection act. the right to do traditional agriculture without using pesticides and chemicals is also permitted. the encroachment activities are directed to be removed forthwith. ..... society, sanjaya gandi fishermen co-operative society, srungavarappadu of krishna district will be cancelled. the claimants are not entitled to any compensation under wild life (protection) act, 1972 as they were assigned the lands by the government on free of land value;(11) d-form pattas to the extent of ac .....

Kunapuraju Rangaraju Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD802; 1998(3)ALT215

..... g.o.ms. no.76 environment, forest, science and technology (forest iii) department, dated 25-9-1995 under section 18 of the wild life protection act (for short 'the act') and whether the petitioners could be prohibited from carrying on pisciculture in the lands owned or occupied by them till final notification under section 26a ..... pradesh with effect from 5-8-1973. the prime object of the enactment is for the protection of wild animals and birds and for matters connected therewith or ancillary or incidental ..... the preliminary notification was already issued under section 18 of the act. therefore, by virtue of the interim orders the petitioners who are pattedars of the lands are being permitted to continue their fishing operations.5. the parliament enacted the wild life (protection) act, 1972, which came into force in the state of andhra .....

Samir Mathur Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003AP321; 2003(2)ALD858; 2003(3)ALT47

..... declared by a person arises for consideration in this writ petition.2. the petitioner herein filed a declaration as required under section 40 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972 (for short, the act), and rule 34 of wild life (protection) (andhra pradesh) rules, 1974 (for short, the rules) on 23.8.1993. in covering letter accompanying declaration it is stated that his father late r.r. mathur ..... force of the rules. be it also noticed under various provisions of chapter-v(a) which is introduced by wild life (protection) (amendment) act, 1986 trade or commerce in trophies, animals, articles etc., derived from certain animals is prohibited and under section 50 of the act, they are offences.4. rule 35 of the rules lays down the procedure to be adopted by the chief .....

Nature Park Walkers Association Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD111; 1998(2)ALT380

..... the respondent to regulate entry into the park. the second writ petition has been filed against the notification dated 19-3-1994 made under section 35 of the wild life protection act intending to declare the area as a national park. another writ petition no. 117040/97 was also filed for the direction to the respondent to withdraw the ..... only to keep it as a 'lung space' for the city, that the object of the wild life protection act was only to preserve animals which is inconsistent with maintenance of large park inside the city and there are really no wild animals in that area, that generally national parks which form large areas of a minimum 50,000 ..... of a public property, has a right to regulate the entry for protection of that public property. he submitted that the recent restrictions were intended only to protect and conserve the area and docs not amount to any harassment.5. the perusal of the wild life protection act shows that the government has been enabled to declare any area as a .....

Nature Park Walkers Association, Hyderabad and Another Vs. State of A. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD624; 1999(2)ALT604

..... whether the notification suffers from any infirmity warranting interference under article 226 of the constitution of india.9. the notification is issued under section 35 of the wild life (protection)act (act 53 of 1972). section 35 reads as follows :'section 35. declaration of national parks : (1) whenever it appears to the state government that an ..... to finalise the guidelines before 31-3-1999 and issue permits subject to the conditions that they may prescribe under section 28(2) of the wild life (protection) act. the members of the petitioner-association are eligible for the grant of permits subject to the conditions that the respondents may impose. till the guidelines ..... of articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of india.7. while the learned counsel for the respondents contended that under section 35 of the wild life (protection) act the state government is competent to declare an area whether within a sanctuary or not by reason of its ecological, faunal, floral, geomorphological or .....

J.K. Johnson and ors. Vs. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(4)ALD61; 2005(3)ALT533; 2006CriLJ1480

..... crime report and the seizure panchanama, discloses that, prima facie, the petitioners were suspected to have committed the said crime, which is serious in nature, under wild life (protection) act. it is also to be observed that the respondents without making any enquiry and without stating anything whether the offence committed by the petitioners relates to such offence, ..... rabbits along with 2 riffles were seized under the cover of panchanama. then, he registered a case in crime no. 43 of 2004 under section 9 of wild life (protection) act, 1972. the jeep was not at all seized under the cover of panchanama. but what was seized are only the carcass of the forest pig and 3 ..... compensation of rs. 25,000/-, forfeited the vehicle jeep no. ap 12 d 703 and two riffles of the petitioners to the state under section 39 of wild life (protection) act, 1972 and the third petitioner, who is the owner of the said vehicle, was informed that the said vehicle has been forfeited to the government vide .....

Obulapuram Mining Company Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, Sri B.V. Sri ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2010(2)ALT672

..... of timber, illegal mining in forest area, and any other conservation issue; and(b) the implementation of the indian forest act, 1927, wild life (protection) act, 1972, forest (conservation) act, 1980, environment (protection) act, 1986 and the national forest policy, 1988 including the rules, regulations and guidelines framed thereunder; in respect of which the supreme ..... 2 of the forest (conservation) act, the clearance under environment (protection) act and the clearance under pollution (control) act and it had made all necessary applications for grant of necessary clearance under the pollution (control) act and the authorities accorded necessary permissions under the said act. the petitioner has commenced the mining ..... is no lease or permission. in such a situation, it is only appropriate that the mineral that is available is first preserved or protected before coming to conclusion as to, to whom it belongs. iron ore is not a perishable commodity. the impugned order would only ensure .....

Wild Life Protection Society, Hyderabad Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD346; 2002(2)ALT555

..... india, we are of the opinion that the 1st respondent-state of andhra pradesh has taken all precautionary measures to protect wild life animals and for enforcement of the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972 under the scheme of development of national parks and sanctuaries, project tiger, project elephant. the government of india ..... financial constraints and that the central government has also provided financial assistance to the state government for effective enforcement of the provisions of the wild life protection act, 1972 under the scheme of development of national parks and sanctuaries project tiger, project elephant and that the amount released so far under ..... writ of mandamus to the respondents: (a) to effectively enforce the provisions of the wild life protection act of 1972 by providing additional measures and precautions to prevent such gory incidents in future in all the places of wild life habitat; (b) to direct the respondents to conduct a judicial enquiry into the .....

Bukke Hima Bindu Vs. State of A.P. rep. by Chief Secretary, GAD (LandO ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... . offence no.6, piler ps cr.no.116/2014 u/s 20(1)(c) (ii)(iii)(iv) and (x) of a.p.forest act, 1967, sec.29 of wild life protection act, 1972, sec.55(2) of biological diversity act, 2002, sec.353, 307, 379 ipc r/w 34 ipc: occurred on 11.6.2014 5 pm at reserve forest located northern side of ..... no.68/2014, u/s 307, 353, 379 r/w 34 ipc sec.20(1)(c) (ii) (iv) and (x) of ap forest act, 1967 sec.29 of wild life protection act, 1972 and sec.55(2) of biological diversity act, 2002 and rule 3 of ap red sander and sander wood transit rules: on 23.06.214, si of police, y.v.palem received ..... grounds of detention referred to a series of crimes registered against the detenue in different police stations under the a.p. forest act, a.p. sandalwood and red sandalwood transit rules, 1969, wild life (protection) act, 1972, biological diversity act, 2002 and under the provisions of the indian penal code. the 2nd respondent refers to the following instances in recording his satisfaction to pass .....

Visakha Spca Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD539; 2000(6)ALT666

..... government that revised proposals are likely to be issued in respect of arrears covered under crz -i and crz -ii, the said notification was left unconsidered. similarly, the wild life (protection) act enunciates the measures to protect the wild life. in centre for environmental law v. union of india, : (1998)9scc623 , the apex court reiterated the constitution of wildlife advisory board, appointment of honorary wildlife wardens and ..... issuance of proclamation under section 21 of the wild life (protection) act, 1972.11. the large issue as pointed out by the petitioner is as against the damage and destruction caused to sea turtles on the coast line, which stood supported by .....