Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 18 declaration of sanctuary Court: andhra pradesh Page 8 of about 259 results (0.139 seconds)

T. Subbarayudu Vs. the Branch Manager New India Assurance Company Ltd. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal/revision that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way, and sufficient cause should be made .....

G. Sukumar Vs. Dr. Bodiga Dasharatha and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

i. venkatanarayana, president: 1. this is a complaint filed under section 17(a)(i) of consumer protection act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite parties jointly and severally to pay rs. 6,00,000 towards compensation for loss of life of complainants wife and child and mental agony suffered by him and also to award costs of this complaint. 2 ..... to go to a big hospital in hyderabad. the complainant has not hired their services nor paid any consideration. hence, the complaint itself is not maintainable under consumer protection act. 9. it is contended by the ops 1 and 2 that when they have not treated the patient nor conducted any surgery the question of negligence on their ..... by the op3 that when he did not treat the deceased, the question of deficiency of service does not arise. hence, this complaint itself is not maintainable under consumer protection act. 13. complainant sri g. sukumar examined himself as pw1 and dr. dasharath (op1) and dr. b.p. sagar (op3) are examined as rws 1 and 2 .....

Bapatla Engineering College and Another Vs. Thimmapuram Seshadri

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the order of the district consumer forum, guntur in c.d. no. 187/1999 dated 11.7.2003 the present appeal has been filed under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986. 3. the facts leading to the filing of this appeal are set out as hereunder: the complainant was a diploma holder and appeared for engineering common admission test for .....

Penki Krishnam Naidu Vs. M/S National Horticulture Board, Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... the complainant was not found eligible. the opposite party contended that the complainant is not a consumer as defined in sec.2(1)(d) of the consumer protection act, 1986 and there is no consumer dispute between the complainant and the opposite party since the subsidy from the opposite party under its back ended capital investment scheme ..... assuming that he paid application fee, it does not amount to consideration and therefore the complainant does not fall within the definition of consumer as defined under consumer protection act, 1986. be that as it may, the subsidy offered by the opposite party is a grant by way of credit linked back ended subsidy and it ..... of global horti services also mentions the sy.no.230. in this context, we also rely on the judgement of the national commission in neelam gupta vs reliance life insurance and another? reported in i (2011) cpj, 241 held that material suppression of facts of the case would disentitle the person approaching consumer forum from claiming .....

K.Jaya L Vs. G.Adi Laxmi and Anot

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... constitutional remedy against the first appellate court order of the state commission. it is no doubt not a case under the criminal procedure code but under the consumer protection act and that cannot be taken as a guidance without referring to and without comparison of the actual words used and the intendment of the legislatures and ..... judge expression of the bombay high court in r.b.upadhyay v. state commission for consumer disputes, mumbai in referring to section 21 of the consumer protection act on the jurisdiction of the national commission against dismissal of the consumer disputes redressal, district forum order confirmed by state commission order in saying second appeal held ..... special magistrate, hastinapuram, l.b.nagar, rangareddy district, having been aggrieved by the acquittal judgment of private complaint case under section 138 of n.i act impugned unsuccessful by the complainant of the private complaint case in crl.a no.184 of 2014.2. in fact at this stage, the learned counsel .....

M. Venkateswarlu Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... can override the right conferred upon the workman by the provisions of section 47. iii) the persons with disabilities act, 1995, is a parliamentary recognition of the special needs of persons with disabilities; of the affirmative action that is required to protect their life and liberty under article 21 of the constitution and to ensure them a right of dignified existence. iv) a ..... formulated by the supreme court in the above case is now incorporated in section 47of the act. 45. in narendra kumar chandla vs. state of haryana and others , supreme court held that article 21 protects the right to livelihood as an integral facet of right to life. when an employee is afflicted with unfortunate disease due to which, when he is unable to .....

P.Parameshwar Re Vs. The State of Telangana, Rep.By Its Princ

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... also weakened and damaged. when the petitioner failed to comply with the instructions of the department, we complained to the police and took assistance from the local police in protecting the tank bund in public interest. without disclosing any of these facts, the petitioner filed the above writ petition. this honble court was not inclined to grant any ..... in this case and hope that this will be a lesson to the present petitioner as well as to other litigants and that at least in future people will act more truthfully and with a greater sense of responsibility. the invocation of jurisdiction under extraordinary powers vested in this court cannot be allowed to a person, who comes ..... initiated by the prescribed authority. the preface and para 21 of that judgment read as under: "for many centuries, indian society cherished two basic values of life i.e., `satya' (truth) and `ahimsa' (non-violence). mahavir, gautam buddha and mahatma gandhi guided the people to ingrain these values in their daily .....

Mohamad Hydar and ors. Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1953CriLJ454

..... the lower court's procedure is altered by a statute, then how the position could be different when the act prescribing the discriminatory procedure becomes void by reason of its repugnancy to the equal protection clause of the constitution? although the substantive rights and liabilities secured or accrued before the date of the constitution ..... for the question of confirmation of a sentence would arise only where the sentence passed is of imprisonment of more than 10 years or of transportation for life or of death. section 20 of the hyderabad criminal procedure code enacts that where the sentence passed is imprisonment of more than 10 years, such sentence shall not ..... into force. the special judge convicted the accused (appellants before the supreme court) and sentenced them to death under section 302/34 and to transportation for life under section 302/34 and to varied terms of imprisonment for other offences for which they were charged. the appellants appealed to the bombay high court. the .....

Anabeshahi Wine and Distilleries Private Ltd. Vs. the Government of An ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972AP379

..... licensees from converting it into potable alcohol and converting it into potable alcohol and thereby avoiding payment of heavy duties renders little or no service to the licensees but only protects its own interest. . . . . . . . . . . . . '37. the next object, according to the government for which the excise staff is posted at the factory ..... can be levied on alcoholic liquor for human consumption, which is produced or manufactured in the state,.12. section 21 of the andhra pradesh excise act authorises the levy of excise duty on excisable articles manufactured or produced in the state, and countervailing duty on such articles produced or manufactured elsewhere ..... the rules'), made by the government of andhra pradesh in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section 72 of the andhra pradesh excise act, 1968 (hereinafter called 'the act'), the petitioner, anabeshahi wine & distilleries private ltd., hyderabad, has been carrying on the business of manufacture and sale of wine and other .....

In Re: GraIn International and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1981AP301

..... respect thereof, either alternatively or cumulatively, the plaint shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the fees that would be chargeable on the plaints under this act if separate suits were instituted in respect of the several causes of action. provided that, where the causes of action in respect of reliefs claimed alternatively ..... times and at different places. when that allegation is denied, question of fact peculiar to each individual petitioner would fall for determination by the court. the acts of the respondents or their subordinates, which gave rise to the cause of action in each case of obstruction to the transport of rice or broken rice ..... petition, it does not appear that any instructions, written or oral, have been issued by any of the respondents herein pursuant to which their subordinates are acting uniformly in similar situations. the allegation that each one of the subordinates at the commercial taxes check posts is insisting upon the production of a permit, is .....