Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: wild life protection act 1972 section 18 declaration of sanctuary Court: andhra pradesh Page 9 of about 259 results (0.158 seconds)

Jun 19 2006 (HC)

Kyathur Chakali Chinnakka Vs. Noorjahan Begum

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD498

..... and willing to perform the contract, is thus not established by the defendant, and so i hold that the defendant is not entitled to the protection under section 53-a of the transfer of property act. the point is answered accordingly.point no. 2:9. the contention of the learned counsel for the defendant is that since plaintiff, before withdrawing ..... and as she is in possession of the plaint schedule property in part performance of the agreement in her favour, she is entitled for protection under section 53-a of the transfer of property act. ex.b7 agreement of sale dated 24-11-1972 executed by the vendor of the plaintiff in favour of the defendant shows that the ..... the contentions of the defendant and decreed the suit. hence this appeal.6. the points for considerations are(1) whether the defendant is entitled to protection under section 53-a of the transfer of property act?(2) whether the suit is barred under order 2 rule 2 of code of civil procedure?point no. 17. rambhau namdeo gajre v. narayan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 27 2003 (HC)

Kapitan Distilleries and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(5)ALD504

..... in the counter affidavit the respondents have justified the levy with the following reasoning:'....the import pass fee is, in the nature of regulating the import in order to protect the locally manufacturing rs distilleries. by levying import pass fee of rs. 1/- per bulk litre; some, of the iml manufacturing distilleries may purchase the ena from ..... units in the state of maharashtra is superior in quality and that they have been purchasing the same duly obtaining the permission from the competent authority under the act and the rules. it is also their contention that ena is not available up to the required quantities in the state of andhra pradesh, apart from the ..... the 1st respondent has no legislative or legal, competence to levy the import pass fee. according to them, the various provisions of the a. p. excise act (for short 'the act') and the rules made thereunder enable the government to levy different kinds of fee on liquor as such and not the raw material used therefor. a further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 21 2001 (HC)

Smt. C. Uma Devi Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2001AP460; 2001(5)ALT307

..... municipal solid wastes (management & handling) rules, 1999 issued by the central government in terms of the provisions of sections 3, 6 and 25 of the environment (protection) act, 1986.14. we, therefore, dispose of the writ petition with the following directions : .1. respondent no.3 corporation shall not dump the garbage in the park ..... as originally notified, may adversely affect the ecological balance and bio-diversity of that area. it would, therefore, be proper and safer to apply the 'principle of protection' and the 'principle of polluter pays' keeping in mind the principle of 'sustainable development' and the principle of inter-generation equity.13. further, we are of ..... opinion, was not commensurate with the professed policy decision of the state and the municipality.11. further, referring to section 63 of the west bengal municipal act, 1993, it was observed ;the obligatory functions leave no manner of doubt that the park being a property, having vested in the municipality, it has the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2001 (HC)

Rajani Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director Vs. Union of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(4)ALT483

..... not directed to run concurrently.3. although the provisions of code of criminal procedure, 1974 are not expressly made applicable to the proceedings under the consumer protection act, 1986, having regard to the provisions contained in subsection (2) of section 4 of the code of criminal procedure, the procedural provisions therein shall ..... ; (1) when a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for life shall commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously sentenced, unless the court directs that the subsequent ..... (1) when a person already undergoing a sentence of imprisonment is sentenced on a subsequent conviction to imprisonment or imprisonment for life, such imprisonment or imprisonment for life shall commence at the expiration of the imprisonment to which he has been previously sentenced, unless the court directs that the subsequent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2011 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Visakhapatna Vs. Ms.Vizag District Milk Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... ".........raw hides and skins and dressed hides and skins constitute different commodities of merchandise and they could therefore be treated as different goods for the purposes of the act."10. idandas is a case, which arose out of a dispute between the landlord and tenant. the tenant using leased premises was engaged for the business of ..... this is, however, subject to certain conditions as contemplated in sub-section (2) thereof. for ready reference, we quote hereunder section 32a(1) and (2) of the act.7. 32a. investment allowance.-- (1) in respect of a ship or an aircraft or machinery or plant specified in sub-section (2), which is owned by the assessee ..... assessee-firm is engaged in the business activity of manufacturing or producing articles or things and is entitled to investment allowance u/s.32a of the i.t. act?"4. from a perusal of the order of the assessing officer and revision commissioner, there cannot be any dispute that the assessee claimed investment allowance on plant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2013 (TRI)

Hdfc Bank, Lakshimpuram Branch Guntur 5-87-90, Rep. by Its Dy. Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way and sufficient cause should be made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2013 (TRI)

The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co.Ltd., Ananthapur Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way and sufficient cause should be made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2013 (TRI)

M/S Universal Packers, Movers and Logistics Rep. by Its Branch Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to ..... time. proof of sufficient cause is a condition precedent for the exercise of discretion of jurisdiction vested in this court under section 15(a) of the consumer protection act. the discretion conferred on this court is a judicial discretion and is exercised to advance justice and even if there is a strong cause for acceptance of the ..... appeal that would not be a ground for condoning the delay. consumer protection act provides for speedy redressal to consumer disputes. it follows that the delay cannot be allowed to occur in a routine way and sufficient cause should be made .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2013 (TRI)

Radiant Info Systems Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director and Another Vs. Sm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly belated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2013 (TRI)

M/S. Narne Estates Private Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director and O ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... court has to keep in mind that the special period of limitation has been prescribed under the consumer protection act, 1986 for filing appeals and revisions in consumer matters and the object of expeditious adjudication of the consumer disputes will get defeated if this court was to entertain highly ..... anshu agarawal vs. new okhla industrial development authority reported in iv (2011) cpj 63 (sc) the honble supreme court stressed the need to consider the object in consumer protection act while deciding application how to condone delay and held that: it is also apposite to observe that while deciding an application filed in such cases for condonation of delay, the ..... against the order of the district forum along with it an application f.a.i.a.no.9 of 2013 u/s 15 of c.p.act (r/w sec.5 of limitation act) to condone delay of 574 days on the ground that it had received the copy of the order on 20.04.2011. thereafter the petitioners .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //