Welsh V Roe - Judgment Search Results

Thambu Bashyam Ayyangar and anr. Vs. N. Srinivasachariar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1933Mad734

prohibition by the party to counsel who nevertheless compromised. This case was alluded to by Maccardie, J., in Welsh v. Roe (1918) 87 LJ KB 520 with regard to the powers of a solicitor. Bank of New South Wales

Chuni Lal Mandal Vs. Hira Lal Mandal and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1928Cal378

cases have bean cited to us. Strass v. Francis [1886] 1 Q.B. 379 reaffirmed in the case of Welsh v. Roe [1918] 87 L.J.K.BN. 520 and the Calcutta case of Asharam Choutmal v. E.I. Ry. Co. [1918] 87 L.J.K.B.

Askaran Choutmal Vs. the E.i.Ry. Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1925)ILR52Cal386

Francis (1866) L. R. 1 Q. B. 379., Mathews v. Munster (1887) L.R. 20 Q. B. D. 141., Welsh v. Roe [1918] 87 L. J. K. B. 520, and Shepherd v. Robinson [1919] 1 K. B. 474. In some … I do not agree with him in thinking that this case 'is 'not a precedent of general application' Welsh v. Roe (1918) 87 L. J. K. B. 520, 522. In my opinion, all cases relating to the authority of

Askaran Choutmal Vs. E.i. Ry. and Co.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal696

to the other side: Strause v. Francis (1866) 1 Q.B. 379, Mathews v. Munster (1887) 20 Q.B.D. 141, Welsh v. Roe (1918) 87 L.J.K.B. 520 and Shepherd v. Robinson (1919) 1 K.B. 474. In some cases in which the … I do not agree with him in thinking that this case 'is not a precedent) of general application' Welsh v. Roe (1918) 87 L.J.K.B. 520. In my opinion, all eases relating to the authority of counsel must now be

Califano Vs. Westcott

Court: US Supreme Court

or it may extend the coverage of the statute to include those who are aggrieved by the exclusion." Welsh v. United States, 398 U. S. 333 , 398 U. S. 361 (1970) (concurring in result). In previous cases … peculiarly within the province of the Legislative Branch. See Califano v. Jobst, 434 U. S. 47 (1977); Maher v. Roe, 432 U. S. 464 , 432 U. S. 479 (1977); Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 471 (1970).

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

is a continually evolving 79. Shortly thereafter, in 1977, an instructive judgment is to be found in Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 at 598 and 599 by the U.S. Supreme Court. This case dealt with a legislation

Boy Scouts of America Vs. Dale

Court: US Supreme Court

United States Court of Appeals have ruled that the Boy Scouts is not a place of public accommodation. Welsh v. Boy Scouts of America, 993 F.2d 1267 (CA7), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1012 (1993); Curran v. Mount … sexual orientation to the newspapers may, of course, be a matter of great importance to John Doe. Richard Roe, however, may be much more interested in the weekend weather forecast. Before Dale made his statement at Rutgers,

Skinner Vs. Railway Lab. Execs. Ass'n

Court: US Supreme Court

based on a valid warrant or undertaken pursuant to a recognized exception to the warrant requirement, see, e.g., Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U. S. 740 , 466 U. S. 748 -750 (1984); whether the search was based on … purpose. Under the circumstances, we do not view this procedure as a significant invasion of privacy. Cf. Whalen v. Roe, 429 U. S. 589 , 429 U. S. 602 (1977). [ Footnote 8 ] See, e.g., Ala.Code §

Obg Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Allan and Others (Respondents)

Court: House of Lords

for instance, Metropolitan Borough of Solihull v National Union of Teachers [1985] IRLR 211, 213, paras 7-10, and Welsh Development Agency v Export Finance Co Ltd [1992] BCLC 148, 179. If and in so far as observations … English law has outgrown the need for legal fictions. There was a time when John Doe and Richard Roe were popular characters. They had to be parties to some forms of action. When they were in their

Distt. Registrar and Collector, Hyderabad and anr. Vs. Canara Bank Etc ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC186; [2005]126CompCas356(SC); 2004(5)CTC376; JT2004(9)SC379; 2004(9)SCALE215; (2005)1SCC496

not to others nor to society as a whole'. The same learned Judge had said earlier in Whalen v. Roe (1977) 429 US 589 that the right embraces both a general 'individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal