Vis - Judgment Search Results
O. Syed Abbas, Proprietor, Sathyam Restaurant, No. 8, Thiru-vi-ka Road ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-21-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Mad64
ORDER1. The petitioner had filed five interlocutory applications pending the appeal filed by him against the dismissal of his suit for bare injunction in respect of his alleged rights in the Sathyam Theatre Complex. The five...
Sector-6, Bahadurgarh Plot Holders' Association (Regd.) and Ors. Vs. S ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-06-1995
Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)23; JT1995(9)SC167; (1996)114PLR323; 1995(6)SCALE765; (1996)1SCC485; [1995]Supp6SCR276
Failing which, it was stated, that action under Section 10 of the Punjab Act would be taken which visualises resumption and forfeiture. The members of the Association acted as required by the notices but without actually taking
Sector-6, Bahadurgarh Plot Holders' Association and Ors. Vs. State of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-07-1997
Reported in: AIR1998SC2347; JT1998(8)SC117; 1997(3)SCALE552; (1997)10SCC97; [1997]3SCR680
Engineer in his affidavit has stated in paragraph 4 that 'I say and submit that I have personally visited and inspected Sector-6, Bahadurgarh and found that the development as well as additional works detailed in the affidavit
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Arockiasamy and 6 others Vs Maria Joseph alias Jayakumar
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-18-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 18-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL A No. 3067 of 2025 in O.P.No.47 of 20061. Arockiasamy S/o.Jacob2. Robert Rajkumar S/o.Mr.Arockiasamy3. Daniel S/o.Mr.Arockiasamy4. Kithion S/o.Mr.Arockiasamy5. Johnes S/o.Mr.Arockiasamy6. Rachel D/o.Mr.Arockiasamy7. CharlesS/o.Mr.Arockiasamy...
Alagesan and 6 ors. Vs. State by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-03-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ3300
ORDERM. Jeyapaul, J.1. The revision is filed challenging the order of dismissal passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur in Crl.M.P. No. 1940 of 2007 filed under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2....
Vi Brij Fiscal Services P. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-08-2010
Reported in: [2010]155CompCas157(MP)
Shantanu Kemkar, J.1. This company petition has been filed under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act') read with Rules 92 to 94 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 (for short, 'the...
Thamizhthendral Thiru.Vi.Ka Aided Middle School, Vs. the District Elem ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-16-2010
1. The writ petition is filed against the order of the first respondent dated Nil 1.2010 signed by the first respondent on 23.01.2010 in his proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.440/B5/2010 thereby revoking the approval granted for the...
Thiru Vi.KA. Dr.Mu.VA. Educational Trust Vs. the Commissioner and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-19-2011
O R D E R1. The petitioner Trust was initially registered on 21.1.1955 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 under the name and style of 'The High School Committee at Shenoy Nagar' and subsequent to the...
Arb Lr 6 (Del) It Was Observed That Vs. Unknown
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EX.P. 57/2009 with E.A. No.253 of 2010 Reserved on: January 24, 2012 Decision on: February13. , 2012 AGRITRADE INTERNATIONAL PTE. LTD. ... Decree Holder Through: Ms. V....
“6. Although the Learned Counsel for the Appellant Vs. the Superinte ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-16-2013
CWP-9116 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9116 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision:16. 7.2013 Kartar Singh ...Petitioner Versus The Superintending Canal Officer & another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJAN...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free