Vis - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: vis Page 1 of about 444 results (0.035 seconds)Su-vi Pharmaceuticals and Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
1. The challenge in the present appeal is towards the penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- imposed upon the appellants under the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarayani and 6 ors. Vs. Govinda
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1883)ILR7Mad352
Charles A. Turner, Kt., C.J.1. There is no authority for the practice which has been recently introduced in the Malabar...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnjalai and 6 Others Vs. Arumuga Chettiar and Another
Court: Chennai
Reported in: 2000(2)CTC154
ORDER1. The appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore in A.S.No.136 of 1985 in confirming...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDevi and 6 Others Vs. K. Jayaraman (Cavetor)
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (2001)1MLJ231
ORDER1. The defendant is the petitioner whose application is condone the delay of 316 days is filing the petition to...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSu-vi Pharmaceuticals and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
2. The issue involved in this appeal is about availability of modvat credit on capital goods.3. The appellant unit is...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVi Brij Fiscal Services P. Ltd. Vs. Primus Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: IV(2006)BC388; [2005]127CompCas395(MP); (2006)2CompLJ190(MP); [2005]64SCL192(MP)
A.M. Sapre, J.1. This is a company petition filed under Section 433 of the Companies Act seeking winding up of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKunhambi and 6 ors. Vs. Kalanthar and ors.
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR1915Mad711; (1914)27MLJ156
Tyabji, J.1. The question on which the parties to this appeal are at issue is whether they are governed by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlagesan and 6 ors. Vs. State by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai
Reported in: 2008CriLJ3300
ORDERM. Jeyapaul, J.1. The revision is filed challenging the order of dismissal passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Thiruvallur...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDwarka Sector 6 Vendors Association vs.delhi Development Authority and ...
Court: Delhi
$~1, 4, 15, 17 & 18 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:24....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“6. Although the Learned Counsel for the Appellant Vs. the Superinte ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
CWP-9116 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9116 of 1987 (O&M) Date of decision:16....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>