Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Vii - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 11 2026

7 Eleven Inc ( A Delaware Limited Liability Company) Vs The Deputy Reg ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-11-2026

Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, Intellectual Property Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai-32. 3.Ravi Foods Private Limited, 7-4-112/1, Madhuban Colony Road, Kattedan, Hyderabad-500077.(R3 substituted vide order of court dated 31.7.2025 made in CMP(TM).Nos. 1 & 2


Mar 08 2022

Jayaprakasan and 7 Others vs Charaparambil Sakkena and Another

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-08-2022

39 YERS, S/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "PUTHANKALATHIL",THALAKKULATHUR P.O, THALAKKULATHUR,KOZHIKODE TALUK. 6 MEERA, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "KALATHINKAL HOUSE",PERUVATHUR P.O,KOYILANDY. 7 REETHA,AGED 46 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN MASTER, "KAKKADATH ITHAM VEETTIL", FEROKE P.O, CHERUVANNUR,KOZHIKODE TALUK. 8 GIRIJA, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O.GOPALAN


Jan 28 2020

Group 7 Guards (India) Pvt Ltd vs Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-28-2020

VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 8TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.26512 OF 2019(L) PETITIONER: GROUP 7 GUARDS (INDIA) PVT LTD CC-32/426, NEAR PALLISSERY JUNCTION, PALLISSERY ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN, KERALA - 682 025, REPRESENTED BY


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 08 2006

Executive Engineer, Vii Construction Division, U.P. Jal Nigam, Vs. Pre ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-08-2006

Reported in: (2006)IILLJ1076All

Matched in: Parties Executive Engineer, Vii Construction Division, U.P. Jal Nigam, Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Ravi NaraIn Singh Son of Sri Chandra Bali Singh


Mar 21 2011

24 X 7 Learning Private Limited. Vs. ZaIn Family Trust a Private Trust ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-21-2011

1. The plaintiff in O.S. 7/2009 has come up in this appeal challenging the order dated 03.10.2009, passed on l.A. 1 filed, under Order


Nov 16 2012

“7. We Do Not Find Any Force in the Arguments Raised by the Vs. Fina ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-16-2012

CWP No.6344 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6344 of 1994 Date of decision:16.11.2012 Birender Singh .....Petitioner Versus Financial Commissioner & others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.Kushagra...


May 22 2013

“7. Keeping in View Ratio Decidendi of Abovesaid Rulings and in a Gi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-22-2013

CRM not M-17137 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-17137 of 2013 Date of Decision:22.05.2013 Joga Singh .....Petitioner Versus Bhupinder Kaur and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER...


Sep 10 2013

“7. We Have Heard the Appellant (Writ Petitioner) in Person and Lear ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-10-2013

Gulati 2013.09.13 13:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.4223 of 2008 & 7 CWP No.15403 of 2008 courts will interfere only if they find all or any of the following: (i)


Feb 24 2014

“7. from 07.06.2011 to 14.09.2011 as Many as 25 Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-24-2014

S201403.03 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM M- 6637 of 2014 7 however, must be given to the other party. The power conferred by Section 311, CrPC, must, therefore, be


Apr 01 2014

(Annexure P-7) Issued Under Sections 4 and 6 the Land Vs. Moti Ram and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-01-2014

3 is needed at this stage. The prayer in this writ petition is to quash the notification dated 7.7.2011 (Annexure P-2) and 06.07.2012 Kumar Mohinder 2014.04.03 14:47 I attest to the accuracy of this order Chandigarh CWP


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial