Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Vigil - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 1993

Lincoln Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-24-1993

Matched in: Parties Lincoln Vs. Vigil


Aug 01 2013

Laljee Prajapati and Others Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-01-2013

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5818of2013 1.LaljeePrajapati 2.ChaitaPrajapati 3.AjitPrajapati Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.RaviPrakash,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/01.08.2013 CallforareportfromthetrialCourtastohowmanywitnesseshavebeen examinedtillthedateandhowmanywitnesses,citedinthechargesheet,are lefttobeexaminedandalsotheexpectedtimetoconcludethetrial. Listthiscaseon16.08.2013. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC


Aug 06 2013

Ram Binod Prasad Sinha Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-06-2013

B. A. No. 2413 of 2013 Ram Binod Prasad Sinha ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 16 2013

Laljee Prajapati and Others Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-16-2013

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.5818 o”1. Laljee Prajapati 2. Chaita Prajapati 3. Ajit Prajapati ............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Ravi Prakash...


1870

United States Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1870

Matched in: Parties United States Vs. Vigil


1871

United States Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1871

Matched in: Parties United States Vs. Vigil


Mar 05 2003

M. Ramachandran Vs. the State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-05-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3376

P.W.1 was not willing to pay any bribe, he approached the office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Department, Salem with Rs.500/- (M.Os.1 to 3 series) at about 7.30 a.m. on 26.12.1989 and


Apr 29 2026

Vigilance Council of India vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5802/2026 VIGILANCE COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swarn Kumar and Ms. Jayanti Jha, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI &


May 24 2024

Social Justice Vigilance Forum vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-24-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: SOCIAL JUSTICE VIGILANCE FORUM RDHAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O K R THANKAPPAN PILLAI, RAJANI VIHAR, PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI, PIN


Feb 23 2023

The Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau vs Suo Moto

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-23-2023

RP NO.231 OF 2023 ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2020 IN SSCR NO.2 OF 2020REVIEW PETITIONER: THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU REP. BY THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER (VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU) HIGH COURT OF


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial