Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Vigil - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 1993

Lincoln Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-24-1993

Lincoln v. Vigil - 508 U.S. 182 (1993) OCTOBER TERM, 1992 Syllabus LINCOLN, ACTING DIRECTOR, INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE, ET AL. v.


Aug 01 2013

Laljee Prajapati and Others Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-01-2013

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5818of2013 1.LaljeePrajapati 2.ChaitaPrajapati 3.AjitPrajapati Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners :Mr.RaviPrakash,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/01.08.2013 CallforareportfromthetrialCourtastohowmanywitnesseshavebeen examinedtillthedateandhowmanywitnesses,citedinthechargesheet,are lefttobeexaminedandalsotheexpectedtimetoconcludethetrial. Listthiscaseon16.08.2013. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC


Aug 06 2013

Ram Binod Prasad Sinha Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-06-2013

B. A. No. 2413 of 2013 Ram Binod Prasad Sinha ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 16 2013

Laljee Prajapati and Others Vs. Vigilance

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Aug-16-2013

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.5818 o”1. Laljee Prajapati 2. Chaita Prajapati 3. Ajit Prajapati ............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.Ravi Prakash...


1870

United States Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1870

United States v. Vigil - 77 U.S. 423 (1870) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Vigil, 77 U.S. 10 Wall. 423 423


1871

United States Vs. Vigil

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1871

United States v. Vigil - 80 U.S. 449 (1871) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Vigil, 80 U.S. 13 Wall. 449 449


Mar 05 2003

M. Ramachandran Vs. the State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Police, ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-05-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ3376

P.W.1 was not willing to pay any bribe, he approached the office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Department, Salem with Rs.500/- (M.Os.1 to 3 series) at about 7.30 a.m. on 26.12.1989 and


Apr 29 2026

Vigilance Council of India vs Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-29-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5802/2026 VIGILANCE COUNCIL OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swarn Kumar and Ms. Jayanti Jha, Advocates.versusGOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI &


May 24 2024

Social Justice Vigilance Forum vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-24-2024

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.MANU FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: SOCIAL JUSTICE VIGILANCE FORUM RDHAKRISHNAN, ADVOCATE, AGED 59 YEARS, S/O K R THANKAPPAN PILLAI, RAJANI VIHAR, PADIVATTOM, EDAPPALLY P.O., KOCHI, PIN


Feb 23 2023

The Vigilance and Anti Corruption Bureau vs Suo Moto

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-23-2023

RP NO.231 OF 2023 ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER DATED 21.01.2020 IN SSCR NO.2 OF 2020REVIEW PETITIONER: THE VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU REP. BY THE SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER (VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU) HIGH COURT OF


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial