View - Judgment Search Results
Numaligarh Refinery Ltd. Vs. Green View Tea and Industries and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-15-2007
Reported in: AIR2007SC1733; 2007(3)AWC3097(SC); 2008(3)GLT(SC)36; JT2007(8)SC238; 2007(4)SCALE400; (2007)9SCC242
in Review Application No.54 of 1998. Special Leave Petition No.7182 of 2005 has been preferred by M/s. Green View Tea and Industries Ltd. whose lands measuring about 681 bighas, 1 katha with tea bushes, drainage system, garden
Hill View Colony and Ors. Vs. State of Nagaland and Ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-21-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6022 OF2012Hill View Colony & Ors. ….Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Nagaland & Ors. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) This appeal
Green View Tea and Industries Vs. Collector, Golaghat, Assam and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-17-2004
Reported in: AIR2004SC1738; 2004(2)AWC1723(SC); 98(2004)CLT157(SC); [2004(2)JCR124(SC)]; JT2004(2)SC556; 2004(2)SCALE547; (2004)4SCC122
1998 were withdrawn. On 25.8.1999, the High Court dismissed the Review Application No. 54 of 1998 taking the view that there was no error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment of the High
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Green View Tea and Industries Vs. Collector, Golaghat and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-09-2001
Reported in: 2001IXAD(SC)518; AIR2002SC180; JT2001(9)SC497; (2002)1MLJ91(SC); RLW2002(1)SC137; 2001(8)SCALE163; (2002)1SCC109
glaring omission on patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility.'9. [The same view is reiterated inAribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma and Ors. : (1979)4SCC389 , Northern India Caterers (India)
City View Tourism, Represented by Its Managing Partner, Mr. Feminad Mu ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-25-2025
TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 7948 OF 2025 PETITIONER: CITY VIEW TOURISM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MR. FEMINAD MUHAMMED AGED 24 YEARS S/O.MUHAMMED 18/93 NEAR JUMA MASJID PERINGATHUR
Sea View Prawn Hatcheries Pvt Ltd, Represented by Its Managing Directo ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-07-2024
WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 18TH MAGHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 2641 OF 2024 PETITIONER: SEA VIEW PRAWN HATCHERIES PVT LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GEORGE PATANI, AGED 72 YEARS S/O JOSEPH PATANI, MARATHAKKARA
Golden View Vyapar Private Limited, vs Peerumedu Grama Panchayat,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-19-2024
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 9730 OF 2024 PETITIONER: GOLDEN VIEW VYAPAR PRIVATE LIMITED, AGED 58 YEARS GLENMARY ESTATE, PEERUMEDU, IDUKKI, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THOMAS MATHEW, S/O
Sea View Prawn Hatcheries Pvt Ltd Represented by Its Managing Director ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-22-2023
TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 27851 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SEA VIEW PRAWN HATCHERIES PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, AGED 72 YEARS, PATANI VILLA, MARATHAKKARA PO, OLLUR, THRISSUR,
Hill View Metal Products vs the District Geologist
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-19-2023
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 19309 OF 2014 PETITIONER: HILL VIEW METAL PRODUCTS PULLUVAZHI P.O., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR M.V.JOY, S/O. M.D.VARGHESE, MANAYATH HOUSE, PULLUVAZHI DESOM,
M/S.Views vs Union of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-31-2023
consideration in this writ petition. It is submitted that the said judgment has become final. In the above view of the matter, nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition in the light of the judgment repelling
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free