Victim - Judgment Search Results
Victim vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-09-2023
of accused in a case charge-sheeted by the police for the offence under Section 376 and 312 IPC,the victim came up in revision. The order of acquittal was passed mainly on the reason that the alleged cohabitation
XXXXX vs Victim
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-24-2023
BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHERTHALA DIVISION, REPRESENTED THORUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 VICTIM XXX BY ADVS. SRI.P.S.RAMU, SRI. M P PRASANTH PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
Victim, vs the State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-28-2022
NO.22/2013 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, PARAPPANANGADI SC NO.459/2013 OF SPECIAL COURT UNDER POCSO ACT, MANJERI APPELLANT/VICTIM: VICTIM, AGED 36 YEARS. BY ADVS. O.V.MANIPRASAD SRI.JOSE ANTONY RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, (REP BY
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Victim vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-03-2022
Matched in: Parties Victim vs State of Kerala
Victim vs the State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-24-2022
sheet anchor of the appellant's arguments in this appeal, filed under the Proviso to Section 372, Cr.P.C.2. This victim appeal is directed against thejudgment of the Additional Sessions Court No.I(Special Court), Pathanamthitta in S.C.No.314/2017 dated 27.2.2020, as
Victim vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-25-2022
SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 15671 OF 2019 PETITIONER: VICTIM AGED 33 YEARS XXX BY ADVS. K.SHAJ K/0000114/2017 RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, KERALA
Victim, vs State of Kerala,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-25-2022
SIVARAMAN FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 4TH AGRAHAYANA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 15671 OF 2019 PETITIONER: VICTIM AGED 33 YEARS XXX BY ADVS. K.SHAJ K/0000114/2017 RESPONDENTS: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, KERALA
Victim. vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-12-2021
the part of the investigating agency and it has seriously affected her right to get justice as a victim of the crime. Similarly, by placing reliance upon Section 53A, he contends that, there is a statutory mandate
Victim vs State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-12-2021
the part of the investigating agency and it has seriously affected her right to get justice as a victim of the crime. Similarly, by placing reliance upon Section 53A, he contends that, there is a statutory mandate
(Victim) vs Surendran M. @ Kalyani Surendran
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-10-2021
aged between 48 to 79, were alleged to have ravished a minor girl, as complained of by the victim and her mother. The prosecution case rests squarely on the evidence of the victim. I. The revision and
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free