Vice Comes - Judgment Search Results
Fox Vs. Vice
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-2011
Fox v. Vice SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2010 FOX V. VICE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOX v . VICE, as … the press. Yet all of these machinations failed; Fox won the election. And Vice got an even greater comeuppance: He was subsequently convicted of criminal extortion for his election-related conduct. Fox, however, chose not to let the
Air Vice Marshal S.L. Chhabra, Vsm (Retd.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-11-1993
Reported in: JT1993(3)SC359; (1993)IILLJ658SC; 1993(2)SCALE885; 1993Supp(4)SCC441; 1993(3)SLJ49(SC)
N.P. Singh, J.1. Leave granted.2. The appellant, while holding the post of Air Vice Marshal, filed a writ application, questioning the validity of the decision of the Union of India, refusing to … dependent, only on the merit and the service, he has rendered to the nation.8. The High Court has come to the conclusion that in view of the remarks, having been expunged in the year 1989, the case
Allahabad Development Authority Through Its Vice Chairman and R.K. Sin ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-28-2005
Reported in: AIR2006All71
petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, Allahabad Development Authority, Allahabad through its Vice Chairman and Sri R.K. Singh, Secretary, Alllahabad Development Authority, Allahabad, seek the following reliefs:-(a) to issue a writ, … stayed had been wiped out from existence and the order of stay granted pending disposal of a case comes to an end with the dismissal of the substantive proceeding and it is the duty of the Court
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited, Rep. by Its Vice Preside ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-25-2008
Reported in: LC2009(2)264; 2009(41)PTC597(Mad)
Precedent - Full Bench decision Held, It is binding on the Division Bench. Only if the Full Bench comes to conclusion that earlier Full Bench decision is incorrect, there is scope for making reference to larger Bench.
The Vice Chancellor Ranchi University Vs. Jharkhand State Housing Boar ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-23-2018
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8113 OF2009THE VICE CHANCELLOR, RANCHI UNIVERSITY & ORS. ….Appellant(s) VERSUS JHARKHAND STATE HOUSING BOARD & ORS. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, … in the writ petitions was between the writ petitioners (employees) and the University because the writ petitioners had come into possession of the flats through the University. They had, therefore, no independent cause of action in relation
Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University Vs. Kanubhai Nanubhai Vag ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-26-2021
OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.4443 of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.12171 of 2019) Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University .... Appellant(s) Versus Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela and Anr. …. Respondent (s) WITH Civil Appeal
The Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority Vs. Narender Kumar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-08-2022
OF INDIA (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1880 OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) NO(S). 12817 OF2020 THE VICE CHAIRMAN DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NARENDER KUMAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1881 OF2022(Arising out of
Vice Chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi National Aviation University versus Jite ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-21-2026
Reported in: [2026] 6 S.C.R. 509
[2026] 6 S.C.R. 509 : 2026 INSC 520 Vice Chancellor, Rajiv Gandhi National Aviation University v. Jitendra Singh & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 8054 of 2026) 21 … special provision for the application of legislation to the circumstances which exist at the time when the legislation comes into force1. One feature of a transitional provision is that its operation is expected to be temporary, in
Vice Chancellor Luknow University Vs. Akhilesh Kumar Khare andanr
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-08-2015
of the contingency fund. In order to prevent the abuse of power in engaging daily wagers, the then Vice-Chancellor of the Lucknow University issued Order No.VC/1932/90 dated 03.08.1990 notifying that the daily wagers would not be allowed
Vice-chairman, Hyderabad Urban Development Authority Vs. Kavitha Reddy ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC1871; 2003(2)SCALE533; (2003)9SCC580
of (Judicature) Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Appeal No. 7(SIC) of 2000 dated December 2, 2000, the Vice-Chairman, Hyderabad Urban, Development Authority is in appeal before this Court.4. The respondent filed Writ Petition No. 4187 of
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free