Vessel - Judgment Search Results

Anna Aluminium Vessels vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 6TH CHAITHRA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 7682 OF 2014 PETITIONER: ANNA ALUMINIUM VESSELS, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, PIN - 683 562, ALUVA, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER BOBY M.JACOB. BY ADVS. SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR SRI.P.BENNY

Owners Partners Vessel Shbdharti Vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering Pltd

Court: Chennai

MADRAS DATED:29. 01/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA A.No.4265 of 2012 in C.S.No.504 of 2012 Owners Partners Vessel SHBDharti vs. Seahorse Marine Engineering PLtd FOR PETITIONER : Krishna FOR RESPONDENT : notgiven ORDER: VINOD K. SHARMA,

Cether Vessels Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993(41)ECC94; 1993LC93(Madras); 1992(60)ELT214(Mad)

ORDER1. The reason for filing W.P. No. 15015 of 1991 is that a show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner on 20-03-1991 to show why a duty of Rs. 1,65,25,983-97 should not be demanded...

Cethar Vessels Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993(41)ECC199

the writ petitions.2. The petitioner in all these three writ petitions is one and the same viz., Cethar Vessels Ltd., represented by its Joint Managing Director, Mr. R.T. Arasu. The petitioner is a manufacturer of boiler components

Cethar Vessels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(143)ELT336Tri(Chennai)

the three parties. In terms of his adjudication order and findings recorded by him, the appellants namely Cethar Vessels brought into existence movable property namely boilers which were required to have been discharged duty under Heading 8402.10

Cethar Vessels Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(81)ECC142

the three parties. In terms of his adjudication order and findings recorded by him, the appellants namely Cethar Vessels brought into existence movable property namely boilers which were required to have been discharged duty under heading 8402.10

Cethar Vessels (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(86)ECC296

after examining the issue in the light of the appellant's own judgment rendered in the case of Cethar Vessels (P) Ltd. v. CCE, 2002 (81) ECC 142 (T) : 2002 (143) ELT 336 waiver of pre-deposit is

Mithusha Vessels and Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT1152Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellants herein are inter alia engaged in the manufacture of "trailers and semi-trailers not mechanically propelled and parts thereof", namely, tanker trailer, whether or not fitted with pumps.They had filed a classification list effective...

Shree Ram Vessel Scrap Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(176)ELT683Tri(Mum.)bai

order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Ahmedabad.2. The issue relates to determination of assessable value of a vessel imported for breaking. The appellant claims that as per the commercial invoice dated 22.10.2002 issued on the basis

Cethar Vessels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)10STJ10CESTAT(Chennai)

1. This is an application for stay filed by M/s. Cethar Vessels Pvt.Ltd., Trichy. The application seeks stay of operation of the order in appeal No. 71/06 dated 18/09/06. The