Varnish - Judgment Search Results
Neo-shine Varnishes Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-09-1993
Reported in: 1993(48)LC23(Bombay)
it was noticed that the petitioners had cleared paints and varnishes without proper documents. The enquiries revealed that the petitioners had
Bharat Varnish Mfg. Co. Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-18-1983
Reported in: [1983]53STC365(Bom)
Sujata Manohar, J.1. The assessees, M/s. Bharat Varnish Mfg. Co. are a firm manufacturing paints, varnishes, etc. For
Standard Varnish Works Vs. Steamship bris
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-13-1919
Standard Varnish Works v. Steamship "Bris" - 248 U.S. 392 (1919) U.S.
Turn these results into brief-ready notes
Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sterling Varnishes
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-25-1989
Reported in: 1989(20)ECC109; ILR1989KAR920
Hiremath, J1. Respondent is the manufacturer of industrial varnishes whose product is liable to excise duty under the Central
Bank of Baroda Vs. Indochem and Varnish Industries
Court: DRAT Allahabad
Decided on: May-31-2005
Reported in: II(2006)BC56
Defendant No. 1 is manufacturing and doing business of resin, varnish etc. at Haldwani in the district of Nainital. Defendant No.
C.C.E. Vs. Shankar Varnish and Phenyle
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-31-1995
Reported in: (1995)(79)ELT163TriDel
1. This is an appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) filed by the Collector of...
Chandigarh Administration Through the Estate Officer, Union Territory ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-22-1996
Reported in: AIR1996SC3318; JT1996(4)SC375; (1997)115PLR259; 1996(3)SCALE680; (1996)8SCC374; [1996]3SCR819
Industrial area, Chandigarh was allotted to M/s. Johnson Paints & Varnish Co. for industrial use. The allottee was Kulraj Singh Paul,
Noble Paints Private Limited (Formerly Known as Noble Paints and Varni ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-16-2003
Reported in: 2004(3)BomCR356; [2004(101)FLR27]; 2004(1)MhLj420
manager. The second party was working in production department in varnish section. He was also required to work in the laboratory
Dilip P. Mehta Vs. Mercury Paints and Varnishes Limited and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-12-2003
Reported in: 2003(6)BomCR261
Khandeparkar R.M.S., J.1. Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner. None present for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2, though...
Rainbow Ink and Varnish Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Rollatainer ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-16-2006
Reported in: [2008]145CompCas189(P& H); (2006)143PLR634
Hemant Gupta, J.1. The petitioner has sought winding up of respondent company under Sections 433(e) read with Sections 434 and...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »
Try AI Brief & Semantic Search — 7 days free