Van Allen V Assessors - Judgment Search Results
Barnett Bank of Marion Cty., N. A. Vs. Nelson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-16-1996
of Logan v. Walker Bank & Trust Co., 385 U. S. 252 , 260-261 (1966) (same); see also Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, 586 (1866) (enforcing 1864 amendments to National Bank Act expressly authorizing state taxation of national
American B. and T. Vs. Dallas County
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-05-1983
shares, see, e.g., Cleveland Trust Co. v. Lander, 184 U. S. 111 , 184 U. S. 115 (1902); Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, 70 U. S. 584 -588 (1866), this implication has not been necessary for any of … that their results in no way turned on an exception to § 3701 created by § 6219. In Van Allen v. Assessors, for example, the Court did not state unambiguously, as the dissent implies, post at 463 U. S. 875
Society for Savings Vs. Bowers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-16-1955
dissent, to permit such taxes to be assessed without the exclusion of federal obligations owned by the banks. Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573 (1866); National Bank v. Commonwealth, 9 Wall. 353 (1870); Des Moines National Bank v. Fairweather,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Tradesmens Nat'l Bank Vs. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-25-1940
a state to impose a tax on the franchise of a national banking association cannot now be doubted. Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573. Compare Keifer & Keifer v. RFC, 306 U. S. 381 , 306 U. S. 389 … state taxing power, just as national bank shares were so subjected by the Act of June 3, 1864. Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573. See Des Moines National Bank v. Fairweather, 263 U. S. 103 ; Peoples National Bank
Schuylkill Trust Co. Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-11-1935
of the law, but merely affected the executive agencies which were to administer it. [ Footnote 8 ] Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573; Cleveland Trust Co. v. Lander, 184 U. S. 111 ; Des Moines National Bank v. … to the extent that bonds of the national government are included in the capital. This is settled law. Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573; Cleveland Trust Co. v. Lander, 184 U. S. 111 ; Des Moines Bank v. Fairweather,
James Vs. Dravo Contracting Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1937
not interposed to protect their property from state taxation, such taxation is not obnoxious to that objection." See Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, 70 U. S. 585 ; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Pennsylvania, supra. We hold that … Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 570 , 283 U. S. 575 . [ Footnote 2/43 ] Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573. [ Footnote 2/44 ] Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460 , 105 U.
Helvering Vs. Gerhardt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-23-1938
its intent to protect it from state taxation. Congress may curtail an immunity which might otherwise be implied. Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, or enlarge it beyond the point where, Congress being silent, the Court would set its
Schuykill Trust Co. Vs. Pennsylvania
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-03-1938
that the Legislature intended to tax trust companies on the same basis as banks." [ Footnote 10 ] Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573; First National Bank v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 9 Wall. 353, 76 U. S. 359 ;
Graves Vs. New York ex rel. O'Keefe
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-27-1939
is not now necessary to define, for granting or withholding immunity of federal agencies from state taxation. See Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, 70 U. S. 583 -585; Bank of New York v. Supervisors, 7 Wall. 26, 74
Beidler Vs. South Carolina Tax Commission
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-24-1930
Egyptian Order v. Michaux, 279 U. S. 737 , 279 U. S. 745 . [ Footnote 2 ] Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573, 70 U. S. 584 ; Hawley v. Malden, 232 U. S. 1 , 232 U.
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free