Vaccination - Judgment Search Results

Director, Bcg Vaccine Laboratory, Madras Vs. S. Pandian and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(2)CTC52; (1996)IILLJ634SC; (1996)2MLJ63(SC); (1997)11SCC346

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. These appeals are directed against the Judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal) dated July 12, 1989. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the respondents and during...

M/s.VACCINE CENTRE Vs The State Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P(MD)Nos.12300 and 12301 of 2026 M/s. Vaccine Centre, Rep. by its Proprietor Mayandi Tamil Selvan, No.336/1, 1st Floor, Aringnar Anna Salai, Ramanathapuram -623 501, Ramanathapuram

Bharat Serum Vaccines Limited, vs State of Kerala,

Court: Kerala

VIJAYARAGHAVAN V MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942 WP(C).No.29084 OF 2020(I) PETITIONER/S:1 BHARAT SERUM VACCINES LIMITED, 3RD FLOOR, LIBERTY TOWER, PLOT NO K-10, BEHIND RELIABLE PLAZA, KALWA INDUSTRIEAL ESTATE, AIROLI, NAV MUMBAI-400 708,

Government Vaccine Institute and the Superintendent, Government Vaccin ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2006(3)JCR211(Jhr)]

to consider it as a special case. Accordingly, by letter dated 5.11.1982, petitioner No. 2 (the Superintendent, Government Vaccine Institute, Namkum, Ranchi) appointed respondent No. 2 (Shashi Bhushan Choudhary) on purported 'compassionate ground' as 'Mazdoor' and requested

Bcg Vaccine Laboratory, Rep. by Its Director Vs. Committee for the Pur ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)2MLJ508

P.K. Misra, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed by BCG Vaccine Laboratory against the Committee for the purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiment on Animals, hereinafter referred to

Bio Vaccines (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC858

1. The appellants are manufacturers of Absorbed Tetanus Toxoid (ATT) under chapter heading 30.03.20. During manufacture of ATT, a broth answering Muller & Miller Media emerges. Medium culture is used captively for propagation and development of...

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd vs Serum and Vaccines Inc and Ors

Court: Delhi

of decision: 16.04.2026 + ARB.P. 2112/2025 MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate.versusSERUM AND VACCINES INC AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)1. The present Petition has been

The Commissioner of Income Tax-iv Vs. Indian Vaccines Corporation Ltd.

Court: Delhi

..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Jr. Standing Counsel. versus INDIAN VACCINES CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar with Mr. Sheel Vardhan, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA

Shashi Bhushan Choudhary Vs. Government Vaccine Institute Namkom and a ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2009(1)JCR612(Jhr)]; (2009)IILLJ663Jhar

wages.2. The relevant facts, in short, are that the father of the appellant was employed in the Government Vaccine Institute, Namkum, Ranchi and he retired from service on 31/12/1980. Subsequently, he died and then his widow made

Bombay Glass Blowing Industries Vs. Bio Vaccines Private Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(1)ALD390; [1999]98CompCas174(AP)

ORDER1. This is a petition for compulsorily winding up the respondent-company under Sections 439(1)(b) and 433(e) read with Section 434(1)(a) of the Indian Companies Act, 1956.2. The admitted facts of the case, in short, are that...