Usance - Judgment Search Results

Sudhir Shantilal Mehta Vs. C.B.i.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(10)SC554; 2009(11)SCALE217; (2009)8SCC1; [2009]96SCL403(SC); 2009AIRSCW5709; [2009] 12 SCR 682

For the said two cheques receipts were obtained from Syndicate Bank and State Bank of Patiala. The two usance promissory notes were handed over to Accused No. 7 and Accused No. 9. Indisputably, J.H. Mehta, the drawer

American Express Bank Ltd. Vs. Calcutta Steel Co. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1993]76CompCas768(SC); 1992(3)SCALE536; (1993)2SCC199; [1992]Supp3SCR833

documents, executed a trust receipt in favour of the appellant and endorsed its acceptance on the said three usance Bills of Exchange duly accepting with the following crucial endorsements :Drawn under Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 166/86

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2003]261ITR113(Guj)

:I. Questions of law involved in these appeals :In Tax Appeal No. 273 of 2002 :(1) Whether the usance interest paid by the assessee apart from the purchase price of the ship would fall within the scope

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corpn. and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 181(2003)CLT134

under:I. Questions of law involved in these appeals : In Tax Appeal No. 273 of 2002'(1) Whether the usance interest paid by the assessee apart from the purchase price of the ship would fall within the scope

Cit Vs. Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2003)181CTR(Guj)134

as under:I. Questions of law involved in these appeals :In Tax Appeal No. 273 of 2002'(1) Whether the usance interest paid by the assessee apart from the purchase price of the ship would fall within the scope

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. State Bank of Travancore

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1997]228ITR40(Ker)

variance in regard thereto between the parties that in banking parlance, the negotiations of bills drawn at a usance (usance bill) alone is termed as 'discount' and negotiations of demand bills is termed as 'purchase'. The exchange

Karamchand Thapar and Brothers Ltd. Vs. Central Bank of India and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(1)MhLj82

of Rs. 2,20,320.81 on the basic agreement/transaction called credit facilities including Clean Demand Endorsed Bills Limit and a Usance Bill Limit. From time to time, parties used to execute necessary documents like pronote. The said Bill Limit

H. Pestongi and Company Vs. Cox and Company

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR1503

importers, anticipating that the goods they had bought would not readily be disposed of during the period of usance of the bills, wished to have it extended so as to avoid being out of pocket to an

Mmtc Ltd. Vs. m/s.vedanta Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

which suggests that it was the duty of the Appellant in this case as well to ensure that usance letter of credits issued were bona fide, and in case of stand­by letters of credit, that they were

S.V.L. Murthy Vs. State Rep. by Cbi, Hyderabad

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2717; 2009CriLJ3930; JT2009(7)SC385; (2009)6SCC77; 2009AIRSCW4165

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals arising out of a common judgment and order dated 17.07.2007 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad were taken up for hearing together and are being...