Unit Trust - Judgment Search Results
Unit Trust of India Vs. Ravinder Kumar Shukla, Etc. Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-19-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC3528; 2005(4)AWC3451(SC); 2005(6)BomCR805; (SCSuppl)2006(1)CHN54; IV(2005)CPJ10(SC); 2005(5)CTC77; (2005)3GLR2757; [2005(4)JCR214(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC345; 2005(4)KLT
the Appeals stand dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Banking - Non-payment - Negligence - Unit Trust of India Act 1963, Section 3 - Appellant issued cheques towards maturity amount of units purchased and/or towards
Administrator, Unit Trust of India Vs. B.M. Malani and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-11-2007
Reported in: (2007)212CTR(SC)425; [2008]296ITR31(SC); RLW2008(1)SC375; 2007(12)SCALE107
income-tax. He had invested an amount of 65 lacs in the Monthly Income Plan (III) offered by the Unit Trust of India under Capital Gains Scheme, the predecessor in interest of the petitioner in the year 1998 with … is less.11. Indisputably, a notice was issued by the Income Tax officer upon the Branch Manager of the Unit Trust of India wherein, inter alia, it was stated:A sum of Rs. 48,08,000/- is due from B.M. Malani of
Unit Trust of India Vs. Sri Shankar Das
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-28-2009
ORDER1. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred by the Unit Trust of India questioning the correctness of order dated 13rd February, 2002 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Unit Trust of India and ors. Vs. T. Bijaya Kumar and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-14-1992
Reported in: JT1992(6)SC82; (1993)ILLJ240SC; (1993)1UPLBEC561
respondent will be placed on probation for one year extendable upto two years at the discretion of the Trust. Pursuant to the said offer, the first respondent joined service on 16th May, 1984. He was placed on
Unit Trust of India and anr. Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jan-25-2005
Reported in: I(2006)BC92; [2005]127CompCas219(Ker)
petitioners. Thereafter, the certificate pledged by defendants Nos. 1 and 2 along with authorisation letter were forwarded to Unit Trust of India, Madras, defendant No. 5, under registered post requesting them to repurchase the units and to remit … left undisturbed. Since no authentication or alternation was made by the plaintiff, the interpolation was made by the Unit Trust of India, Madras, the fifth defendant, within the connivance of defendants Nos. 1 and 2 for getting unlawful
M/S Unit Trust of India and ors Vs. M/S Jagan Nath Sayal and Co.and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on :30.11.2012 Judgment delivered on :05. 12.2012 CO.A(SB) 35/2010 M/S UNIT TRUST OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal. Adv. versus M/S JAGAN NATH SAYAL & … was also admitted to be paid to him for the interregnum period.2. Appellant before this Court is the Unit Trust of India (hereinafter referred to as the appellant).3. The case of the respondent is that he had bought
Unit Trust of India and anr. Vs. P.K. Unny and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-19-2001
Reported in: (2001)168CTR(Bom)99; [2001]249ITR612(Bom)
in Section 23 must be read as gross income. Mr. Dastur contended that under Section 25A of the Unit Trust of India Act, distribution of income is contemplated. He contended that Section 25A shows that unit-holders have a … on business principles having regard to the interest of the unit holder. He, therefore, contended that under the Unit Trust of India Act, the participation by the unit holders is only in the net income and not gross
Unit Trust of India, Mumbai and anr. Vs. P.K. Unny and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-19-2001
Reported in: 2001(3)BomCR673; 2002(1)MhLj301
in Section 23 must be read as gross income. Mr. Dastur contended that under Section 25A of the Unit Trust Act, distribution of income is contemplated. He contended that Section 25A shows that unit holders have a right … on business principles having regard to the interest of the unit holder. He, therefore, contended that under the Unit Trust Act, the participation by the unit holders is only in the net income and not gross income. He
Unit Trust of India Vs. Aaifr and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2001
Reported in: 93(2001)DLT86; 2001(59)DRJ723
Matched in: Parties Unit Trust of India Vs. Aaifr and Others
Unit Trust of India Vs. G.V. Films Ltd. and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-25-1997
Reported in: 1997(2)CTC532
Matched in: Parties Unit Trust of India Vs. G.V. Films Ltd. and anr.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free