Undertaking To Appear - Judgment Search Results

Workmen of Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking Vs. the Management of Del ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC365; (1972)IILLJ130SC; (1974)3SCC108

Delhi, in I. D. No. 34 of 1966.2. Two disputes between the Workmen of the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking and the Management of the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking were referred by the Chief Commissioner. Delhi, for adjudication … of claim before the Tribunal clearly shows that they have no part in any manufacturing process. Their functions appear to be to maintain the existing lines of generation, transmission and transformation of power in their respective areas,

Bombay Electric Supply and Transport (Best) Undertaking Vs. State of M ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [2005]140STC308(Bom)

Tax Tribunal, Mumbai, in R.A. No. 37 of 2004 filed by M/s. Bombay Electric Supply & Transport (BEST) undertaking (hereinafter referred to as 'the assessee') and R.A. No. 47 of 2004 filed by the Commissioner of Sales … Dealing with the first question which is raised at the instance of the assessee, Mr. Joshi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee submitted that the Tribunal having held that the transport activity carried on by

Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking Vs. Victor Cable Industries Ltd. and ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2006(1)ARBLR297(Delhi)

in the price structure and the letter dated 14.5.1990 was not appreciated. Thereafter notices were given by the undertaking to the company to complete the supplies which in any case is not in dispute, were not effected. In … the objector with regard to the award being not reasoned or being without any evidence is concerned, there appears to be no merit in this contention. The arbitrator is not expected to write judgments. So far the

Association of State Road Transport Undertakings Vs. Association of St ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (1987)ILLJ77Del

during the pendency of Suit No. 555 of 1985.2. The plaintiff is an Association of State Road Transport Undertaking. It is registered under the Societies Registration Act. Its registered office is at 811, Ashoka Estate, 24, Barakhamba … for, above, was granted till 9th May, 1985 and that injunction is still continuing. The defendants put in appearance through counsel and they contested the application. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.7. The first

Delhi Transport Undertaking Vs. Zamindar Motor Transport Co. (P) and a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC466; (1970)3SCC840

of the Delhi Transport Authority Act 13 of 1950, and administered it in the name of Delhi Transport Undertaking-hereinafter called D. T. U. Even though the jurisdiction of the Delhi Municipal Corporation extends only to the municipal … contemplated by the Act was given. The proceedings of the State Transport Authority were wholly Irregular.10. Mr. Daphtary appearing on behalf of the D. T. U. contended that the order dated February 10, 1960 which was made

Delhi Transport Undertaking Vs. Balbir Saran Goel

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC836; 1971LabIC642; (1970)IILLJ20SC; (1970)1SCC515; [1970]3SCR757

15 for misconduct that the procedure laid down therein for an inquiry etc. becomes applicable. The contention which appears to have prevailed with the High Court and which has been pressed before us is that although the

Chandigarh Transport Undertaking Vs. Ajit Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2399-2005 Date of decision:-13.03.2014 Chandigarh Transport Undertaking ...Petitioner Versus Ajit Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN

Chandigarh Transport Undertaking Vs. Shakuntla Devi and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.5776 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 12, 2014 Chandigarh Transport Undertaking ...Appellant Versus Shakuntla Devi & Ors...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the … deceased).They claimed ` 30,00,000/- as compensation. On notice, the driver and the owner of the offending vehicle did appear before the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra, and took the stand that no accident as alleged had

Delhi Transport Undertaking and anr. Vs. Krishna Wanti and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1973Delhi196

the order of High Court was not liable to be interfered with. Although, on first impression, it would appear that the interests of the minor child would best be served if she is allowed to remain with

Delhi Transport Undertaking and anr. Vs. Kumari Lalita

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1972Delhi281; 8(1972)DLT188

filed a claim for Rs. 1,00,000 under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act against the Delhi Transport Undertaking. The Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 12,000.00 to her. The Delhi Transport Undertaking filed the present appeal … learned counsel for the petitioners and which would support his own contention. The practice in this Court also appears to permit .the filing of cross-objection when appeals are filed against judgment of the Tribunal. I, thereforee, hold