U S V Certain - Judgment Search Results
The State of Andhra Pradesh and ors. Vs. U.S.V. Balram, Etc.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-28-1972
Reported in: AIR1972SC1375; (1972)1SCC660; [1972]3SCR247
The rules provided a pattern of allotment of seats by reference to certain qualifying examinations. The candidates eligible for admission to the Integrated M.B.B.S. Course, … Government Medical College in the Andhra Pradesh area, issued G.O. No. 1648/Health dated July 23, 1970 as also under G.O. No. 1793/Education dated September 23, 1970, regarding reservation of seats in professional colleges for Backward Classes together … 1. These three appeals, in which the State of Andhra Pradesh is the first appellant, by special leave, are directed against the judgment and order dated … the State, a couple of years back, made its report regarding the various categories of persons who are to be treated as belonging to Backward
Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, Mumbai Vs. U.S.V. Limited and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-02-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)BomCR659; [2002(92)FLR438]; (2002)IVLLJ963Bom; 2002(1)MhLj168
B. S. More, Shri S. L. Rajkondawar and Shri H. G. Shirwaikar. Certain documents inter-alia consisting of the Optical Testing Record, the production slipbook, 34 … the reference to adjudication made to the Court in the negative, upholding in the process the dismissal from service of four workmen. A chargesheet was issued to four workmen, namely, Shri B. G. Shirke, Shri V. V. … April, 1997 the Labour Court has answered the reference to adjudication made to the Court in the negative, upholding in the process the dismissal from service of four workmen. A chargesheet was issued to four workmen, namely,
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. U.S.V. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-2004
Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT318Tri(Mum.)bai
of rejection quoted by the Adjudicating Authority is that the process of repacking should have been carried out under the supervision of Central Excise Officer, which is nowhere appearing in the said Rule 173M. All conditions laid … held as follows: "the ground of rejection quoted by the Adjudicating Authority is that the process of repacking should have been carried out under the supervision of Central Excise Officer, which is nowhere appearing in the said
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mac Laboratories Ltd. and U.S.V. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-12-2004
Reported in: (2004)(167)ELT412Tri(Mum.)bai
issue involved in this case is the classification of certain entities, which are formulations of vitamins with other substances, expectorants and stabilisers etc. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order has come to the following conclusions to … this case is the classification of certain entities, which are formulations of vitamins with other substances, expectorants and stabilisers etc. The Commissioner (Appeals) vide the … Commissioner (Appeals) vide the impugned order has come to the following conclusions to determine the classification to be under Heading 29.36 of CET 1995 and not under Heading 3003.10 thereof. (i) The cartons and labels containing description
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free