Traverse - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Devendra Exports Private Ltd., Rep. by Its Executive Director Vs. ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

the complainant filed a complaint before the state commission against the opposite party praying for the direction to the opposite...

Travers Vs. Reinhardt

Court: US Supreme Court

to be assumed as it must be admitted that james travers and sophia v grayson lived together for many years calling

Troopers Lodge No. 41 Fraternal Order of Police Vs. Walker

Court: US Supreme Court

troopers lodge no 41 fraternal order of police v walker 419 u s 1058 1974 u s supreme court troopers...

Westinghouse Vs. Boyden Power Brake Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cylinder and a triple valve having a piston whose preliminary traverse admits air from the auxiliary reservoir to the brake cylinder ..... cylinder and a triple valve having a piston whose preliminary traverse admits air from the auxiliary reservoir to the brake cylinder ..... only limited to such function when performed by the further traverse of the piston of the triple valve this limitation however .....

Mehta Food Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

..... toll thorough cannot be supported without showing a consideration but toll traverse may and the reason is that the very circumstance of ..... there were as indicated above two divisions toll thorough and toll traverse there are sub divisions also these are in the nature ..... which are usually classified in two kinds toll thorough and toll traverse a toll thorough has no connection with the ownership of .....

Decoteau Vs. District Court

Court: US Supreme Court

..... indian lands within the 1867 reservation borders i the 1867 boundaries of the lake traverse reservation enclose approximately 918 000 acres of land within the 1867 boundaries there reside ..... surrounding circumstances and legislative history all point unmistakably to the conclusion that the lake traverse reservation was terminated in 1891 the negotiations leading to the 1889 agreement show plainly .....

Clark Thread Co. Vs. Willimantic Linen Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... carefully studied over and i fixed on this present style of traverse changer with different lengths of teeth or projections arranged upon ..... the combination substantially in the manner hereinbefore set forth of a traverse changer with right and left hand screws and with nuts ..... for combinations the first claim is for a combination of a traverse changer right and left hand screws and nuts alternately in .....

Producers Oil Co. Vs. Hanzen

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the facts and circumstances however affirmatively disclose n intention to limit the grant to actual traverse lines these must be treated as definite boundaries and a patent to a fractional section ..... acres and other circumstances also indicated that only the lands conveyed were those within the traverse lines the patent of the united states conferred no riparian rights but simply conveyed the .....

North Dakota Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

..... river increased the speed and volume of its flow into lake traverse and thereby raised the level of the lake causing its outlet ..... mustinka ditch was intended to drain farmlands in grant county east of traverse county and was built before 1900 from a point in the ..... in the mustinka river watershed second to a sluice dam in lake traverse third to improvements of the bois de sioux outlet by increasing .....

Smt. Ram Dhani and ors. Vs. Nek Ram Singh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2002(1)AWC218

..... of the contract was mandatory and in case the plea was traversed the plaintiff had further to give proof of his continued readiness ..... his readiness and willingness even though the written statement does not traverse the plea set up in the plaint in mahmood khan v ..... not specific 21 the plea of readiness and willingness has been traversed in paras 9 and 10 of the written statement the averment .....