Transit - Judgment Search Results

Jackson Transit Auth. Vs. Transit Union

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of 1964 requires a state or local government to make arrangements to preserve transit workers existing collective bargaining rights before that government may receive federal financial assistance ..... was aware that public ownership might threaten existing collective bargaining rights of unionized transit workers employed by private companies if for example state law forbade collective bargaining .....

Staten Island Rapid Transit Co. Vs. Transit Commission of State of

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 276 u s 603 1928 u s supreme court staten island rapid transit co v transit commission of state of 276 u s 603 1928 276 u s ..... 276 u s 632 no 615 the staten island rapid transit company plaintiff in error v the transit commission of the state of new york no 606 the ..... and the staten island railway company plaintiffs in error v the transit commission of the state of new york supreme court of the united .....

Raj Kumar Halder vs.transitional Health Science and Technology Institu ...

Court: Delhi

..... c 1974 2016 c m 8502 2016 raj kumar halder through versus in person petitioner transitional health science and technology institute ors respondents through mr p nagesh and mr dhruv gupta .....

Transit Commission Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... result in a serious and increasing depletion of revenue due to competition by municipal rapid transit lines and their probable extension which would entail an unreasonable burden on interstate commerce and ..... order of the interstate commerce commission permitting the abandonment the suits were brought by the transit commission and its members and by the new york they were consolidated the commission .....

Transit Commission Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... march 1925 the carriers submitted another agreement after modification to lessen the proposed rental the transit commission july 28 1925 approved in november the carriers made application for approval of ..... necessity authorizing the long island to continue operation at the rental rejected by the transit commission in december 1925 the interstate commerce commission held that it had jurisdiction but .....

Shri Sanjay Marutirao Patil Vs. Union of India (Uoi),

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(2)ALLMR471; 2008(6)BomCR208; [2008(117)FLR459]; 2008(4)MhLj758

roshan dalvi j 1 the petitioner joined the indian army as a sepoy in the year 1990 he was promoted...

United States Vs. Rock Island Motor Transit Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in arkansas illinois indiana iowa minnesota missouri nebraska tennessee texas and kansas many of transit s operations alongside its parent are in different localities and under other icc ..... authorized to be unified with rights otherwise confirmed in the rock island motor transit company with duplications eliminated the words previously described portion of rights granted covers the .....

Garcia Vs. San Antonio Transit Auth.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1601 et seq which provides substantial federal assistance to urban mass transit programs see generally jackson transit authority v transit union 457 u s 15 1982 umta now authorizes the ..... summary judgment without further explanation the district court ruled that local public mass transit systems including samta constitute integral operations in areas of traditional governmental functions under .....

Gilchrist Vs. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... granted to subways elevated and other street railways were incorporated into the contracts the transit commission in effect denied an application for compensatory rates insisted upon observance of the ..... estimate and apportionment of all contracts for construction equipment maintenance or operation of rapid transit railways built at public expense another amendment chap 498 laws of 1909 authorized the .....

United States Vs. Capital Transit Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the entire trip between the district residential area and the virginia governmental installations transit had strongly urged that its bus and streetcar transportation between residential and business areas ..... that the statute empowers the commission to enter the contested order whether or not transit operates admitted interstate routes the present case differs from the former case involving the .....