Transfer - Judgment Search Results

Topa Mallah ? Jhora Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Kumar Gupta, the learned 2nd Additional District & Session Judge, Gumla in Session Trial No. 63 of 2004. Topa Mallah @ Jhora Son of late Munna Mallah @ Jhora, resident of village-Bargitanr, P.O. and P.S. -Raidih, District-

Topa S/O Dhenu Rathod Vs. Maheshkumar S/O Shankarlal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1996(2)BomCR703

date possession of his land is taken for such acquisition.(1A) Where any condition subject to which permission to transfer was granted is contravened, then the land in respect of which such permission was granted shall be liable

Raju @ Rajesh @ Topa Vs. State of M.P.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)MPHT459; 2002(4)MPLJ225

Ajit Singh, J. 1. Appellant Raju alias Rajesh alias Topa, the sole accused in this case, has been convicted under Sections 302 and 397 of the Indian Penal

ishwar Nath Topa and ors. Vs. Surender Singh Ahluwalia

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1969Delhi289; 5(1969)DLT439

the principal. The mortgages claimed to recover Rs. 30,423.50paise principal and interest, by the sale of the mortgaged property. The suit was contested by the judgment-debtor. He had raised various pleas.3. The learned Subordinate Judge, who was

Transfer Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1999)(108)ELT562TriDel

Matched in: Parties Transfer Industry Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. Vs. City of Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc. v. City of Chicago - 386 U.S. 351 (1967) U.S. Supreme Court Railroad Transfer Svc., Inc.

Adkins Transfer Co., Inc. Vs. Dornbos

Court: US Supreme Court

ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS - 393 U.S. 322 (1969) U.S. Supreme Court ADKINS TRANSFER CO., INC. v. DORNBOS,

Central Transfer Co. Vs. Terminal R. Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal R. Assn. - 288 U.S. 469 (1933) U.S. Supreme Court Central Transfer Co. v. Terminal

Vijayappan C vs Kerala Road Transfer Corporation

Court: Kerala

NO.4, MARARIKULAM NORTH PANCHAYATH, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 688 523. BY ADV MOLTY MAJEED RESPONDENTS : 1 KERALA ROAD TRANSFER CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 023 2 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE),

Rakhal Mandal Vs. Topa Baruah and ors.

Court: Guwahati

for recovery of the possession of the suit land in terms of Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act.4. The defendants-opposite party contested the suit, their case being, briefly stated, thus : The Defendants, Puspa Ram Baruah,