Transcript - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: transcript Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 27 results (0.009 seconds)Gulzar Singh S/O Genda Singh (In Jail) Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Nov-05-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3900
s k agarwal j 1 the appellant gulzar singh has filed this appeal against the judgment and order dated 8...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSheo Lal and anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-16-1999
Reported in: 2000CriLJ3015
s k agarwal j 1 these two criminal appeals no 182 of 1980 and no 472 of 1980 were preferred...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSaudul Azeez Vs. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-21-1999
Reported in: 1999(4)AWC3213
d k seth j 1 in a suit for partition the plaintiff had claimed title on the basis of will...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommittee of Management, Ganga Bux Kanoria Gandhi Inter College, Deori ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: May-10-1999
Reported in: 1999(3)AWC2183
a k yog j 1 committee of management ganga buksh kanorla gandhi inter college kaptanganj deorla through its manager has...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.K. Ogle Vs. Sanwaldas @ Sanwalmal Ahuja
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-18-1999
Reported in: AIR1999SC1437; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)763; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)214; 1999CriLJ2105; 1999(2)Crimes1(SC); JT1999(2)SC230; 1999(II)OLR(SC)33; 1999(2)SCALE124; (1999)3SCC284; [1999]1SCR1233
..... of the incident the trial judge was not justified in rejecting the tape record and transcription the appellants have proved satisfactorily and beyond reasonable doubt the first part of the incident ..... thereof was erased by his own voice by inadvertence after recording his stenographer prepared the transcript in his office most of it under his supervision and though he was temporarily absent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWeeks Vs. Angelone
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1999
..... verdict forms given to the jury and 4 the court reporter s transcription of the polling of the jury i because the prosecutor in this ..... i do not recall seeing a comparable notation in any of the transcripts of capital sentencing proceedings that i have reviewed during the past 24 ..... plus years the transcript states that as they were polled a majority of the jury .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmith Vs. Robbins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Oct-05-1999
..... but merely held unconstitutional illinois requirement that indigents pay a fee to receive a trial transcript that was essential for bringing an appeal justice frankfurter who provided the necessary fifth vote ..... view explaining that the court was not holding that illinois must purchase a stenographer s transcript in every case where a defendant cannot buy it the supreme court of illinois may .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChicago Vs. Morales
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1999
..... up clean these communities up and take it back from them transcript of proceedings before the city council of that as many as ..... committee on police and fire 66 67 may 15 1992 hereinafter transcript eighty eight year old susan mary jackson echoed her sentiments testifying ..... in our houses and off the streets and afraid to shop transcript 126 by focusing exclusively on the imagined rights of the two .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSimon Rajan Vs. Anita Simon Rajan
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-03-1999
Reported in: (1999)2CALLT137(HC),I(2000)DMC116
..... the tape recorder as evidence but that being the primary question the transcript could be used to show that the transcriber had found the ..... same as recorded there at the time of transcription this operated as a check against tampering they could be used ..... to operate the machinery made for the pupose to check the transcription which was done in camera before this court i am satisfied .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBuckley Vs. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-12-1999
..... 1 104 16 eligible elector defined as registered elector 14 volume 1 of the trial transcript is reprinted in pro se plaintiff s app i in no 94 1576 calo and ..... is cited hereinafter as 1 tr volume 2 of the trial transcript is reprinted in pro se plaintiff s app ii in no 94 1576 calo and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial