Skip to content


Transcript - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: transcript Year: 1950 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.007 seconds)
Nov 13 1950 (HC)

Abdur Rahim and ors. Vs. Joseph A. Pinto and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-13-1950

Reported in: 1951CriLJ1333

naik c j 1 i have carefully read through the two judgments of my learned colleagues shripatrao and ansari jj...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1950 (FN)

Ackermann Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-11-1950

..... the court to consider what purports to be its judicial knowledge of the cost of transcripts and the ability of litigants to file typewritten records and briefs the motions refute any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 1950 (FN)

United States Vs. Bryan

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-08-1950

..... upon other grounds for failing to produce the records she does not deny and the transcript of the hearing makes it perfectly clear that she would not have complied with the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 08 1950 (FN)

American Communications Assn. Vs. Douds

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-08-1950

..... aims and tactics of the socialist workers party for example may be found in the transcript of record in dunne v united states 320 u s 790 1943 certiorari denied we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 1950 (FN)

Labor Board Vs. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-15-1950

..... the board its members agent or agency and to be made a part of the transcript 61 stat 148 29 u s c supp iii 160 e

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 1950 (FN)

Automatic Radio Co. Vs. Hazeltine Research, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-05-1950

..... contract we need not concern ourselves with the controversy between counsel as to whether the transcript shows a factual dispute over the use of nonuse of hazeltine patents by petitioner in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 1950 (HC)

State of Bombay Vs. Geoffrey Manners and Co. (No. 2)

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-18-1950

Reported in: AIR1951Bom49; (1951)53BOMLR117; 1952CriLJ441

..... signed by the registrar after the judges have approved their transcripts initialled them in token of their correctness it could therefore ..... omissions all these are intended to be corrected when the transcript comes to the judges before copies thereof are issued to ..... immediately after the judgment is pronounced in open ct the transcript is in many cases submitted for initials of the judgeseveral .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //