Skip to content


Transcript - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: transcript Year: 1938 Page 1 of about 13 results (0.011 seconds)
Jan 03 1938 (FN)

Railroad Comm'n Vs. Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-03-1938

railroad comm n v pacific gas electric co 302 u s 388 1938 u s supreme court railroad comm n...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1938 (FN)

In Re Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-31-1938

..... provided in subsection d refer to the filing of the transcript required in an enforcement proceeding initiated by the board authorized ..... since the statute empowers the board before the filing of a transcript to vacate or modify its orders certainly it does not ..... restraining order and shall certify and file in the court a transcript of the entire record in the proceeding including the pleadings .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1938 (PC)

Cyril Bertram Plucknett Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-03-1938

Reported in: AIR1939Cal545

..... the conviction an application was made to the court for the transcript of the shorthand notes of the judge s summing up on ..... an application was made to me by mr mitter stating that the transcripts which had been provided were not accurate and asking for the ..... that the learned judge who tried the case had gone through the transcript made corrections in it and signed it thereupon on my instructions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 1938 (FN)

Fpc Vs. Metropolitan Edison Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-1938

..... commission is to certify and file with the appellate court a transcript of the record upon which the order complained of was entered ..... thereupon the commission shall certify and file with the court a transcript of the record upon which the order complained of was ..... entered upon the filing of such transcript such court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to affirm modify or set .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 25 1938 (FN)

Morgan Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-25-1938

..... its drift he did not hear the oral argument but read a transcript of it and the appellants briefs and conferred ex parte concerning the ..... secretary it appears that there were about 10 000 pages of transcript of oral evidence and over 1 000 pages of statistical exhibits ..... the evidence was contained in appellants briefs these together with the transcript of the page 304 u s 18 oral argument he took .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1938 (FN)

Ex Parte Century Indemnity Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-12-1938

..... to be proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law which are contained in the transcript but not in the bill of exceptions are not properly authenticated p 305 u s ..... defendant served and lodged its proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and the transcript contains a paper described as defendant s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 1938 (FN)

Labor Board Vs. Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-16-1938

..... as permitted by the act the board filed in the circuit court of appeals a transcript of the record of its proceeding and a petition for enforcement of its order in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 1938 (FN)

United Gas Public Service Co. Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-14-1938

..... customers attached and its business established referring to the findings of the commission and the transcripts of evidence and exhibits which were before the commission and had been introduced in evidence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 26 1938 (PC)

Muthyala Ramachandrappa Vs. Muthyala Narayanappa and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-26-1938

Reported in: AIR1940Mad339

..... be the result of a correction in punctuation made by the learned judge in the transcript of the shorthand judgment without fully realizing the effect of the correction it seems to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 1938 (FN)

Armstrong Paint and Varnish Works Vs. Nu-enamel Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-05-1938

..... plain in the opinion it appears in the record no 32 1923 term vol 13 transcripts of record 1689 footnote 10 see note 5 supra when the trial court concluded the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //