Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 8 of about 412 results (0.065 seconds)

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Others Vs. Union ...

Court : Delhi

..... of amending this constitution. 239aa. special provisions with respect to delhi. - (1) as from the date of commencement of the constitution (sixty-ninth amendment) act, 1991, the union territory of delhi shall be called the national capital territory of delhi (hereafter in this part referred to as the national capital territory) and the administrator thereof ..... in list ii or list iii and list ii includes entry 6 (public health and sanitation and dispensaries), entry 25 (gas and gas works) and entry 26 (trade and commerce within the state), whereas list-iii includes entry 1 (criminal law), entry 7 (contracts including partnership agency), entry 17a (forest), entry 17b (protection of ..... construction. the modern approach has to a considerable extent eroded the exclusionary rule even in england. a constitution bench of this court after specifically referring to assam railways and trading co. ltd. v. i.r.c. in state of mysore v. r.v. bidap; (1973) ii llj 41 8sc observed as under: the trend .....

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

..... examine the legislative history and scheme of the two enactments - particularly in the context of anti abuse provisions. competition act 112. the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969, was enacted to curb monopolies and restrictive trade practices. on 25th october, 1999, the government of india constituted a high level committee to examine the then existing ..... (patentee) the right to use the patent but merely a right to restrain others from doing so. 98. in bayer corporation and ors. v. cipla, union of india (uoi) and ors.: 162 (2009) dlt 371, this court had described "patents" as under:- "patents are monopoly rights granted to those who invent or discover new ..... for measures to prevent abuse of intellectual property rights. 124. article 5(a)(2) of the paris convention provides as under:- "each country of the union shall have the right to take legislative measures providing for the grant of compulsory licenses to prevent the abuses which might result from the exercise of the .....

Andaleeb Sehgal Vs Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... expressly or by necessary implication, an administrative authority exercising judicial or quasi- judicial functions is required to record the reasons for its decision." [emphasis supplied] 36. in union of india and another v. w.n. chadha 1993 supp. (4) scc 260 their lordships, while adverting to the issue of applicability of the doctrine of natural justice ..... of the constitution, for a constitutional provision has a far greater and all-pervading sanctity than a statutory provision ." [underlining is ours]35. in s.n. mukherjee v. union of india (1990) 4 scc 594: air 1990 sc 1984, the constitution bench, while dealing with the applicability of the principles of natural justice, has opined thus: "39 ..... in the other two sections 3 and 4 of chapter ii of the central sales tax act which has the heading "formulations of principles for determining when a sale or purchase of goods takes place in the course of inter-state trade or commerce or outside a state or in the course of export or import", the .....

Purshottam Dass Gupta (Shri) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)645; 80(1999)DLT230

..... inference that he had no rational reason for his decision'. and ipport of this statement, the following decisions are referred to: 'lonrho plc v. secretary of state for trade and industry [1989] 1 w.l.r. 525, see also r. v. civil service appeal board, ex. p. cunningham [1991] 4 all e.r. ..... , workmen v. hindustan steel ltd. : (1985)illj267sc , west bengal state electricity board v. desh bandhu ghosh : (1985)illj373sc , olga tellis v. bombay municipal corporation : air1986sc180 , union of india v. tulsiram k. patel : (1985)iillj206sc central inland water transport corporation ltd. v. brojo nath ganguly : (1986)iillj171sc , o.p. bhandari v. indian tourism development corporation ..... sorry to note that the said hope stands belied notwithstanding the aforesaid observations the high court acted in the manner which can only be termed as arbitrary and unwarranted, to say the least.' 87. in m.s. bindra v. union of india and ors. : (1999)illj923sc the supreme court had to consider the conclusion .....

Sreeranganathan K.P., Sreepadam Vadakkkekkottaram (H) and Others Vs. t ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... -economic benefits of the project mainly include provision of additional revenue generation, triggering growth in the region, provisions of additional employment, development of ancillary industries and trade centres, improvement in quality of life etc. needless to say, it has to be totally guided by the conception of public safety and welfare of the ..... and indirect employment to more than 6000 people. the project will provide a boost to the state of kerala in the field of tourism, pilgrimage, trade and industry and other spheres, thereby bringing sizable sum of revenue to the state and local government departments, and shall be advantageous to the numerous expatriates ..... c) no. 14220/2013. 99. as per bhopal gas peedith mahila sangathan vs. union of india, 2012(8) scc 326, the honble supreme court has declared that only those environmental issues and matters covered under the national green tribunal act, schedule-1 should be instituted and litigated before the national green tribunal. it has .....

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... holmes of the united states of america. the government of india made an experiment by introducing chapter xx-c in the income-tax act, 1961, with effect from 1986, but the supreme court in gautam (c. b.) v. union of india : [1993]199itr530(sc) held that no doubt the government could make an experiment but within the parameters of the ..... interest therein, the bundle of rights at a particular point of time as required, by specifying the needs of the parties. it is an operation between the parties in trading with each other, depending upon the utility of the property from the purchasers point of view and the price from the vendors point of view. it is in this ..... show that the valuation report is nothing but an opinion. he also referred to durga sharan udho prasad v. cit [1976] 103 itr 271 , all india lakshmi commercial bank officers union v. union of india : [1984]150itr1(delhi) and cit v. arun mehra : [1986]157itr308(delhi) .learned senior counsel mr. l. r. gupta also dwelt at length on the .....

Delhi High Court Bar Association and Another, Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995IAD(Delhi)1238; AIR1995Delhi323; II(1995)BC42; [1998]92CompCas849(Delhi)

..... for admission, notice was issued to the respondents to show cause as to why rule nisi not be issued, and at the same time the operation of the act in its applicability to union territory of delhi was stayed by passing the following order on 25 july, 1994 :--'cm. no. 5739/94 : notice for 4 august, 1994. mr. luthra submits that the ..... of banking in india. there is an explanationn to this clause which is as under:--'explanation. -- any company which is engaged in the manufacture of goods or carries on any trade and which accepts deposits of money from the public merely for the purpose of financing its business as such manufacturer or trader shall not be deemed to transact the business ..... an example, it may do the business of investment meaning thereby it may perform financial services which are manifold like arranging mergers, new issues, trading and managing assets of its clients and the like. a debt thereforee, could be due to a bank not only on account of the business of banking but also due .....

Lalit Popli Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)47; 75(1998)DLT269; 1998(47)DRJ531

..... to refer the points raised by the cse and not covered in the aforegoing paras:- cse has stated that he has been victimised by the management due to his trade union activities. no such evidence has been brought on record to substantiate the above said averment advanced by the cse while submitting his written arguments. hence, i express ..... bank service code. your above said acts are also prejudicial to the interests of the bank thereby you have committed a gross misconduct within the meaning of chapter-xi, regulation 3 clause (m) of canara ..... the cheque leaves in question by forging the signature of the a/c holder and got the same presented to encash the cheques fraudulently. by your above said fraudulent acts you have caused damage to the property of the bank thereby committed a gross misconduct within the meaning of chapter-xi, regulation 3, clause (j) of canara .....

Assistant Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Employees Provident ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 122(2005)DLT502; 2005(83)DRJ647; [2006(108)FLR35]; (2006)IILLJ388Del

..... modify the ambit of the provisions of law mentioned therein or to override the same in the specified circumstances. [see t.r. thandur v. union of india (1996) 9 scc 690] the said act does not provide for any period of limitation, the reasons wherefore have been noticed hereinbefore and in that view of the matter, in our ..... . sub-section (4) of section 8 was indicating that the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to any sale in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, unless the dealer selling the goods furnishes to the prescribed authority in the prescribed manner a declaration form duly filled and signed by the registered dealer to ..... in bombay factory. the noida unit had taken loan from state bank of bombay. it has been separately registered under the employees state insurance act, sales tax act, income tax act, excise and salt act and the company at noida maintains its separate profit and loss account. however, it is to be noted that they have consolidated balance sheet .....

Lg Electronics India Pvt Ltd Vs. Bharat Bhogilal Patel and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2012(5)CTC(IP)1

..... of the patent. this is due to the reason that there is no presumption of the validity of the granted patent under the law of patents unlike trade mark act or copyright act. (kindly see the judgment of the bishwanathprashad radhey shayam vs. hindustan metal industries, air 1982 sc 1444 of supreme court where the apex court opines so ..... for the purpose of comparison as to how eu being a trips member has followed the regime under trips agreement. 64. the relevant regulations made by the european union are called as council regulation (ec) no 1383/2003 of 22nd july 2003 titled as concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights ..... powers under article 226 of the indian constitution again passed the order in the w.p.(c) 6878/2011 titled as kingtech electronics (india) pvt. ltd v. union of india which is in the consonance with the interpretation accorded to the rules in the order dated 30th november 2011, the said order dated 19th december, 2011 .....