Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 7 of about 412 results (0.130 seconds)

V.V. Purie Vs. E.M.C. Steel Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas127(Delhi); ILR1979Delhi477

..... postal union from the above course hut the attorney general withheld his consent. thereafter the plaintiff issued a writ of summons ..... to commit such an offence. the executive council of the union of post office workers resolved to call on its members not to handle mails to south africa during a particular week and similar action was also proposed by other trade-unions. the plaintiff gouriet sought the attorney general's consent to act as plaintiff in relator proceedings for an injunction to restrain the .....

Super Cassetes Industries Ltd. Vs. Myspace Inc. and Another

Court : Delhi

..... timet action in copyright infringement. this is as per the learned counsel due to difference in the language of the trade mark act and the copyright act wherein the trade mark law protects likelihood of confusion but the copyright act does not provide any such infringement. thus, the principle of quia timet is not applicable in copyright infringement. c) ..... ) would have been of infringement, then the court would have had jurisdiction and the special provisions of section 62(2) of copyright act, 1957 as well as section 134(2) of the trade marks act are those of the kinds of the long arm provisions in the limited sense. the relevant excerpt from the banyan tree (supra) ..... have already examined section 81 of it act (as amended in 2009), proviso to which excludes the operation of the it law in cases of copyright infringement. 73. it is trite that the court cannot re legislate or add words into the statute. this has been followed in association for development vs. union of india & others, 2010 ( .....

L.K. Advani Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)53; 1997CriLJ2559; 1997(4)Crimes1; 66(1997)DLT618; 1997(41)DRJ274; (1997)116PLR1; 1997RLR292

..... today every member of the executive, every member of the judiciary is covered by the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 as observed by the hon'ble supreme court in k.veeraswamy v. union of india and others, : (1992)iillj53bsc . thus there is no reason, whatsoever,as to why members of the ..... ( vide ex.d-8). the fingerprint and handwriting expert after examining the said diaries was of the following view:- ' from entries of the diaries, nature of trade or business is not ascertainable. the narration of money transaction, illegibly show receipts of money from inconspicuous persons/entities, coded letters of alphabets or unexplained names. similarly, ..... . the source of receipts of money and its destined payment/use appear to have been camouflaged. the transactions do not give indication of any sale, purchase, trading, manufacturing or service etc. business. entries only suggest receipt of money from persons, entities on one side and its payment to other set of persons/entities .....

Jagdish Chandra Trikha Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)753; AIR1998Delhi266; 4(1996)CLT513; [2000]100CompCas839(Delhi); 69(1997)DLT874

..... ltd. air 1917 p c 173; lakhaji dollaji &co.; v. boorugu mahadeo rajanna and another air 939 bom 101; shiv nath ram ram dhari and others v. the union ofindia : air1965sc1666 and m/s. gopal singh hirasingh, merchants v. punjab national bank and another : air1976delhi115 .(63) in dwarka nath rai mohan chaudhuri and another (supra) ..... this judgment may be referred to as below:'(6) the next case on which reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the appellant bank is bombay burmah trading corporation ltd. vs. mirza mohamed ally, 2nd 4 cal116.their lordships of the privy council, after referring with approval to the exposition of willes, j. in ..... meant that although supervising or managing the property while having its physical possession the concerned person remained answerable to the custodian and was to be deemed to be acting on his behalf. subsection (2), is of great significance. according to the postulation in that provision the person in possession of the property carrying out its .....

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Om Prakash Malwaliya

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1985)ILLJ185Del

..... individual workman. this section was inserted by the industrial disputes (amendment) act, 1965, and as such formerly a dispute of an individual workman did not fall within the ambit of an industrial dispute but is could become one, if it was taken up by a trade union or a substantial number of workmen of the establishment. the vital question ..... was employed as a daftri with the petitioner, viz., bank of maharashtra. he was prosecuted for an offence under ss. 110/112/117 of the bombay police act as extended to the union territory of delhi and he was convicted of the same on 30th june, 1977, on his plea of guilty. a fine of rs. 20 was imposed ..... contained in s. 2-a of the act, which introduces a legal fiction that the dispute of an individual workman connected with or arising out of his discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of service by his employer will constitute an industrial dispute; notwithstanding that no other workman nor any union of workmen is a party to the dispute .....

Indian Pilots Vs. Air India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... arrived at (entire details of which may emerge at trial) where the appellant had communicated that it was willing to consider simultaneous movement of pilots from both trade unions subject to certain conditions.(ii) this understanding, however, was given a go-by by the appellant by shooting of a representation to the respondent on 18.10 ..... assuming that the order is without jurisdiction. it is this principle which has been recognised and incorporated in section 9-a of civil procedure code (inserted by maharashtra amendment act no. 65 of 1977), says mr sorabjee. section 9-a reads as follows: 9-a. where at the hearing of an application relating to interim ..... other offices of the plaintiff - company including the residence of the officers of the plaintiff - company. the defendant no. 1, its members and all others acting on its behalf are further restrained from obstructing ingress and egress from the head office, the regional offices or any other offices/ branches and counters of the plaintiff .....

Usha Spinning and Weaving Mills (Ex-workmen) Ass. and ors. Vs. Usha In ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1999IAD(Delhi)437; 1999(48)DRJ653; [1999(82)FLR586]; (1999)IILLJ425Del

..... provides as to who are required to sign the settlement. rule-58(2)(b), inter alia, stipulates that the settlement shall be signed by any officer of a trade union of the workmen or by 5 representatives of the workmen duly authorised in this behalf at a meeting of the workmen held for the purpose. rule-58(3) ..... department, the commissioner of labour, the deputy commissioner of labour and conciliation officer. it was common ground that this settlement was under section 18(1) of the act. the company submitted a petition before the supreme court to decide the appeal in terms of the memorandum of settlement dated 18th october, 1973. on that petition an ..... and a copy thereof has been sent to (an officer authorised in this behalf by) the appropriate government and the conciliation officer). 7. chapter-iii of the act deals with reference of disputes to boards, courts or tribunals, the appropriate government can make reference of an industrial dispute to board for promoting a settlement thereof as .....

Dr. Devinder Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Realogy Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... . a holistic reading of the impugned order will make it apparent that it is not predicated on the cpc but rather essentially on the provisions of the a&c act. in union of india -vs- chadha engineering works, manu/de/3552/2010, a division bench has opined, in substantially similar circumstances, that.since the suit was filed under the ..... corp. -vs- toli investers, 2006(4) arb lr 119 (del), the single judge held a civil suit to be maintainable in a case of infringement of the trade mark city' belonging to the plaintiff. the defendant's stand was that in light of establishment of..in domain name dispute resolution policy the suit was not maintainable and the ..... not been published so far as the parties before us are concerned, spentex does not apply on all fours. after analyzing the celebrated judgments reported as bhatia international -vs- bulk trading s.a., (2002) 4 scc 105, and sbp & co. -vs- patel engineering, (2005) 8 scc 618 and shin-etsu chemical co. ltd. -vs- aksh optifibre ltd., (2005) .....

Javed Rahat and ors. Vs. Bar Council of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2006Delhi200; 129(2006)DLT104; 2006(87)DRJ175

..... in the interest of justice.4. the facts as stated in the writ petition are that the bar council of delhi is a statutory body constituted under the advocates' act. a newly elected body consisting of 25 members of the bar council of delhi was constituted for five years on 31.3.98. copy of the official gazette dated ..... granting extension w.e.f. 1.4.2003 to the bar council of delhi after its expiry.vi) to appoint a special committee under section 8a of the advocates act, 1961 consisting of advocates enrolled with the bar council of delhi excluding the members of expired bar council of delhi and contesting candidates in the forthcoming election of the bar ..... of delhi; andiii) to declare the process of election held by the members of the said expired bar council of delhi as illegal and contrary to the provisions of advocates act, 1961, bar council of india rules and bar council of delhi rules;iv) to quash all decisions/orders/resolutions passed by the said expired body of bar council of .....

State. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... . it reads as under:"239aa special provisions with respect to delhi.-(1) as from the date of commencement of the constitution (sixty ninth amendment) act 1991, the union territory of delhi shall be called the national capital territory of delhi (hereinafter in this part referred to as the national capital territory) and the ..... the constitution (69th amendment) act, 1991, the union territory of delhi shall be called the national capital territory of delhi and the administrator thereof appointed under article 239 shall be designated as the ..... central government was the submission.145. elaborating on this contention, it was submitted that article 239 of the constitution provides that a union territory shall be administered by the president acting through an administrator appointed by him with such designation as may he specify. article 239aa provides that from the date of commencement of .....