Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade unions act 1926 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Page 3 of about 412 results (0.093 seconds)

Ndmc Avam Karamchari Bachao Morcha Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council, Th ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... the respondents on the issue of maintainability of the present t.a. 2. the applicant, ndmc avam karamchari bachao morcha, a registered union of employees of ndmc under the indian trade unions act, 1926, through its general secretary, originally filed the writ petition (c) no.5244/2013 before the honble high court of delhi seeking the ..... following reliefs: (a) to issue a writ of quo warranto holding that the extension of respondent no.4 as advisor (revenue) and advisor (legal) ndmc is illegal and void under the new delhi municipal council act ..... is entertained and allowed. in view of the definition of the `service matter under section 3(q) of the act, referred to above, and also in view of the disentitlement of the applicant-union, from maintaining the ta there being at least one affected person joined in the application, the ta is not .....

Pennwalt (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi23; [1999]97CompCas163(Delhi); 74(1998)DLT422; 1998(46)DRJ434

..... article 226 of the constitution of india, is whether a preliminary investigation, as envisaged in section 11 or section 36c of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 (for short the act) is a condition precedent to the issue of process requiring the owner of an undertaking or any other person to show cause as to why an ..... his property. the application of the said rule can be excluded where nothing unfair can be inferred of want of an opportunity of being heard. in maneka gandhi v. union of india : [1978]2scr621 , the apex court, while elaborately dealing with the rule of audi alteram partem observed as follows:- 'now it is not true that ..... . 110.48 lacs, for the alleged loss suffered by them. on receipt of the application the impugned show cause notice was issued by the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission (hereinafter referred to as the commission), to the petitioner which led to the filing of the present petition, seeking quashing of the notice and setting .....

Colgate Palmolive India (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1980]50CompCas456(Delhi); ILR1981Delhi249

..... to give a hearing to the undertaking before making a reference under sub-section (1) of section 31 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (to be called the act) to the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission (to be called the commission) for an enquiry and report is one of the main questions that calls for decision in ..... is being maintained for the sole purpose of winding up and that the petitioner company has ceased all business operations in india. (56) we had thereforee directed the union of india to intimate to us the position and an affidavit in reply was filed by mr. inder lal nagpal, under secretary to the government of india, ministry ..... court has to decide whether the observance of that rule was necessary turn a just decision on the facts of that case (see a. k. kraipak and others v. union of india and others, : [1970]1scr457 . there is no principle or authority in support of the view that whenever a public authority is invested with power to make .....

Hindustan Vacuum Glass Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1982]52CompCas421(Delhi); ILR1980Delhi969; 1980RLR718

..... limited(hindustan), is an 'undertaking' within the meaning of section 20(a)(ii) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969(the act).(2) number of preliminary objections were raised by the covernment. but finally the union of india agreed to have a ^^^(..111from this court on the question whether hindustan is a memopolyhouse.(3) hindustan ..... 1). the evil of this concentration of power is that it givesrise to a position of dominancy and a necessary corollary of this wasthe exclusion of others from the trade.section 20(a) says : '20.this part shall apply to (a)an undertaking if the total value of (i)its own assets, or (ii)its ..... speak, so manyhyphens that join, so many buckles that bind two or more undertakingsas to bring them within the concept of 'inter-connected undertakings'envisaged by the act. in all these inter-connections one sees the indicia of monopolisation, attempts to monopolise, and the maintenanceof a monopolistic position. all three of these characteristics are .....

Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. and Others Vs. Deputy Secretary to the Go ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1989]65CompCas525(Delhi)

..... capacity. this division of the company's business is named saurashtra chemicals. the company was informed that clearance was necessary under sections 21 and 22 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act. accordingly, the company applied for such a clearance. in the course of discussion, one of the suggestions made to the company was that there should be a dilution of ..... the case law cited before us. one of the cases cited before us was colgate palmolive india v. union of india [1980] 50 comp case 456; [1981] 2 delhi 249. in that case, the enquiry to be held by the commission related to the trade practices indulged in the petitioner company. it was held that no prior hearing was necessary. we agree .....

Mahavir Singh Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1995(71)FLR535]; ILR1995Delhi529

..... 2(ra) of the act defines 'unfair labour practice' to mean any of the practices specified in the fifth schedule. the fifth schedule, inter alia, deals with conducts which would amount to unfair labour practice on the part of the employer and the employees as well as on the part of the trade unions of workmen. item 5 ..... for 335 days and, thereforee, claimed benefit under section 25b of the act. in all these cases the right claimed accrued under the act, thereforee, the remedy was by way of invoking the jurisdiction under the act. 24. in bihar rajya vidyut parishad field kamgar union case (supra) the challenge was on the ground of violation of settlement ..... arrived at between the management and the workman. it was directly covered under the act. thereforee, the labour court was considered to be the proper .....

i.T.C. Limited Vs. Pradeep Anand and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR67(Delhi)

..... of the submissions of counsel for itc on three aspects. the first was that the provisions of section 30b of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act (hereinafter to be referred to as, mrtp act) prohibited a body corporate to enter into an agreement to acquire jointly or severally, whether in their name or in the name of ..... the question to be decided for adjudicating upon the dispute amount to a reference on specific questions, rendering the award binding upon the parties. in thawardas perumal v. union of india : [1955]2scr48 , bose, j., delivering the judgment of the court observed in dealing with the contention that there was a reference of a specific ..... because the court would itself have come to a different conclusion.61. the supreme court took into consideration its earlier judgment in alopi parshad & sons ltd. v. union of india : [1960]2scr793 where the observations made in thawardas pherumal and anr. case (supra) were reiterated and it was observed that if a specific question .....

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. the Director General of Investigation an ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1989Delhi329; [1988]64CompCas884(Delhi); ILR1988Delhi10a

..... a notice under section 10(a)(i) and 10(a)(iv) and section 37 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act, 1969 (for short'the act') and regulation 58 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices commission regulations. 1974 (for short'the regulations') ordering that an inquiry be instituted against the petitioner to ..... to regulation-19of the regulations under which the commission may order apreliminary investigation by the director general when thecommission decides to inquire into any restrictive trade practice under section 10(a)(iv). he said that on this accountallegation for aibitrariness could not be mads against thecommission. this argument was countered by ..... jagmohan and ors. : [1981]1scr746 and swadeshi cotton mills etc. y.union of india etc. : [1981]2scr533 mr. dua, however, submitted that the act was beyond the realm of challengeand that it was protected by section 31b of the constitution.the act appearing at item 91 of 9th schedule to the constitution. he said .....

Allianz Aktiengesellschaft Holding Vs. Allianz Capital and Management ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2002(24)PTC177(Del)

..... the respondent's business or goods is that of the applicant. the relevant question in such a case was identical to that which arose under section 52 of the trade practices act.' 26. it is also submitted that the german company had not yet started its business of nbfc and investment and financial services before the indian company. accordingly, ..... by dishonest intention nor it could be said that it is a calculated attempt to show a close proximity to the plaintiff's business.it was adopted to show union of finance professionals who constitute the board of directors of the defendant company and who are the primary source of investor confidence and satisfaction. the concept of transborder ..... 47 uspq 494. see p. lorillard co. v. peper, 8 cir. (1898) 86 f. 956; collegiate world publ. co. v. du. point publ. co., d.c., ndiii ed (1926) 4 f.2d 158. the judgment is affirmed in so far as it enjoins defendants-appellants from the use of the words 'sunlightmaster' and 'master' in association with the word .....

The Management of Statesman Ltd., New Delhi Vs. Lt. Governor, Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 11(1975)DLT204; 1975LabIC543; (1975)IILLJ33Del

..... the anegentent (petitioner) herein raised number of objections inter alias that mr. mathur was not a workman within the meaning of industrial disputes act,the reference was without jurisdiction, and that the trade union hed net espoused his cause, so the reference was not competent. on the pleadings of the parlies, the tribunal framed the following issues ..... the respondent were treated only as working journalist, the espousel by the union was sufficient in the instant case. on the other hand if he were treated as a workman under lndustrnal disputes act, he needed a larger number of workmen from amongst other trade unions to espouse his cause. the finding, i have returned, is that ..... the respondent no. 3 is a working journalist governed by the journalists act and he is not a workman within the meaning of .....