Trade Practice - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: trade practice Page 1 of about 16 results (0.026 seconds)Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)
MRTP Act, a party continues to carry on with its trade practices unless an order to discontinue or not to repeat the Commission at the initial stage framed the Restrictive Trade Practices (Enquiry) Regulations, 1970, which comprised of 47 Regulations. This was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices C ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1979]49CompCas757(Bom)
On the basis of these allegations, the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements - the 5th respondent - prayed for an enquiry decided to hold an enquiry into the alleged restrictive trade practices complained of in the said application dated 17th August, 1974.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPremier Tyres Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade P ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: AIR1975Delhi204; [1976]46CompCas297(Delhi); ILR1975Delhi777
10(a) brings to the notice of the Commission the restrictive trade practices complained of. The proceeding before the Commission is a different from the others. The disparate nature of restrictive trade practices is like separate causes of action. Just as separate causes
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMotor Industries Company Limited Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: [1990]67CompCas418(Kar)
1982 made under regulation 66 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission Regulations 1974. (ii) To issue a writ of a clause which is likely to result in 'restrictive trade practice'. It is an established position of law that it is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMotor Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practic ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: ILR1986KAR2844
the enquiry without disclosing the necessary facts constituting the restrictive trade practice.8.3) As far as the allegations contained in paras (ii) enquire into the same under the camouflage of Restrictive Trade Practice. It is also further submitted that if the necessary allegations
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHindustan Lever Ltd., Bombay Vs. the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1977SC1285; [1977]47CompCas581(SC); (1977)3SCC227; [1977]3SCR455
rights in the stock of goods purchased, is itself a trade practice. The simple question before us is : can powers area or price will per se be a restrictive trade practice. Every trade agreement restrains or binds persons or places or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBallarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. the Director General of Investigation an ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: AIR1989Delhi329; [1988]64CompCas884(Delhi); ILR1988Delhi10a
made by a complainant that--(i) as a resultof any unfair trade practice adopted by any trader, the complainant has suffered loss control ofmonopolies for the prohibition of monopolistic and Restrictive Trade practices and such other matters connected therewith orincidental thereto. It is,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSushil Kumar Dalmia and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Prac ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: (1993)2CALLT320(HC),[1994]79CompCas568(Cal)
or a registered consumers' association, whether such consumer is a trade of that consumers' association or not) ; or(b) upon a defective and. respondent No. 1, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, impugned orders are absolutely bad in law and this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennwalt (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: AIR1999Delhi23; [1999]97CompCas163(Delhi); 74(1998)DLT422; 1998(46)DRJ434
its own knowledge in the matter of restrictive or unfair trade practice under clause (a) of Section 10 or Section 36B a result of the monopolistic or restrictive, or unfair, trade practice, carried on by any undertaking or any person, any loss
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTanfac Industries Ltd., Rep. by M.H. Upadhyaya, Joint President Vs. Mo ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: 2003(155)ELT251(Mad)
that as against the orders of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, at the behest of second respondent, which is of sale and purchase. But the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission will have jurisdiction under Section 37 to pass orders
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>