Trade Name - Judgment Search Results

K.R. Jadayappa Mudaliar Trading as Sarasu Match Works and anr. Vs. K.B ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1990)2MLJ423

..... is the son of the first petitioner who is also trading in the same trade under the name and style of m s vanaja match works at ..... the respondent has secured registration under the act for a trade mark with the name national park in class 34 in part a under no ..... as follows the first petitioner k rjadayappa mudaliar is trading in match works under the name and style of m s sarasu match works at .....

K.R. Chinnikrishna Chetty Trading as Ragha and Company Vs. K. Venkates ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1973)2MLJ98

..... parle s gluco biscuits the respondents are the manufacturers and sellers of biscuits with their trade name glucose biscuits the colour scheme of the wrapper of the respondents was substantially similar to ..... that the view of the learned judge is correct the appellants snuff sold under the trade name sri andal the registration of which was objected to by the respondents has been in .....

M/S. Sony Kabushiki Kaisa Also Trading as Sony Corporation Vs. Purusho ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... indicated overall similarity has to be considered trade names lakshmanandhara and amritdhara in respect of medical preparation for alleviation of various ailments ..... supreme court 449 amritdhara pharmacy vs satya deo trade marks act 1940 sections 14 18 a 10 1 10 2 trade name likely to deceive and cause confusion tests .....

Smt. Radhika Trading as M/S. Radhika Chemical Works Vs. Shri Satish Ku ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... between the public and the respondent see kerley 9th edition on the law of trade marks and trade names paragraph 383 and the decisions noted thereof noblitt sparks industrys application 1950 68 rpc ..... para c of para 9 has averred that its registration is protected under the statute namely trade marks act 1999 and it has every right to protect it and it does not .....

Supreme Trading Co. Vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

commissioner of trade taxes s a b sai enterprises commissioner trade taxes anr versus versus sahni hardware commissioner of trade taxes

Hare Krishna Trading Company vs.commissioner Trade and Taxes and Anr.

Court: Delhi

10911 2016 w p c 10947 2016 mangla enterprises commissioner trade taxes anr respondents petitioner versus dhanjal engg works commissioner trade

Bhavya Trading Corp vs.commissioner of Trade and Taxes

Court: Delhi

commissioner trade taxes anr versus versus fashion style commissioner of trade taxes anr respondents versus petitioner respondents petitioner respondents petitioner respondents

Sudarsan Trading Co. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... purchased the entire rights of madura company limited including the trade mark and registered themselves as proprietor on 23 4 1967 ..... concurrent use and entitlement thereof thus the registration of the same trade mark was allowed to two different proprietors for different goods ..... submitted that originally the trade mark umbrella was used in tiles and the same was registered in the name of m s madura .....

Amit R. Trivedi, Trading as M/S. Active Health Care Vs. Assistant Regi ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... adoption of few alphabets prominent letters from the bulk drug name or the ailment treatment or both is common phenomena normal trade practice in pharmaceutical industry and in the present case the ..... thereto are set aside appeals allowed and remand the matters to the assistant registrar of trade marks ahmedabad with direction to decide expeditiously the applications in accordance with law however .....

Mahender Kaur, Trading as Maja Cosmetics Vs. Sh.Shanti Kumar Rati Lal, ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... that the first respondent was the subsequent user of the trade mark the trade mark maja was the appellants corporate name the counsel also pointed out to the various contra ..... rejected the applicants first respondent herein have honestly adopted and continuously used the impugned trade mark since 1965 for agarbatties whereas the appellants have not manufactured agarbatties the registrar .....