Trade Mark - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: trade mark Page 1 of about 193 results (0.018 seconds)Registrar of Trade Marks vs.kapoor Saws Manufacturing Co & Ors
Court: Delhi
to produce register, etc.The Registrar or any officer of the Trade Marks Registry shall not, in any legal proceedings to which decide whether any need to summon the Registrar of Trade Marks arises. The petitions are disposed of. No costs. A copy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHugo Boss Trade Mark Management Gmbh & Co. Kg vs.ms. Sheeta Sabharwal ...
Court: Delhi
trade name or in any manner whatsoever, either as a trade mark or part of a trade mark, trade name or trade marks BOSS, BOSS HUGO BOSS and other BOSS formative marks which has been manufactured, distributed, sold or shipped by it;
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegistrar of Trade Marks Vs. Hamdard National Foundation (India)
Court: Delhi
Reported in: AIR1980Delhi180; 17(1980)DLT521; 1980RLR514
trade a Secondary meaning as indicating to people interested,whether as traders or as the public in trade, the goods of a learned single judgeseems to have proceeded as if the trade mark was being sought to be registeredin Part 'A' of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatent and Trade Mark Agencies Employees Union Vs. William Frederic De ...
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1964Cal80
others:(e) drawing up documents affecting proprietorship of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, such as Assignments, Licence Agreements and Registered Users, etc., Rules framed uader the Act relate to registration of trade mark agents, their qualifications etc. Under Rule 148 'subject to the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegistrar of Trade Marks Thr Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks vs.sonik ...
Court: Delhi
said reason in the order of summoning, the Registrar of Trade Marks would be bound to appear. The counsel however states C.R.P. No.146/2015 & CM No.21927/2015 (for stay) REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms. Anumita
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem N. Mayor and ors. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1969Cal80
Singh, AIR 1929 PC 99, a case not under the Trade Mark law laid down the obvious principle that the Evidence 'Ma Durga Brand'.9. As I understand the law of Trade Mark on the point, the general requirement of the law is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaldev Singh Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, New D ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
superior quality of goods in relation to which the said trade mark is used. The onus is on the applicant to if the application for registration is granted and the trade mark is used in connection with the footwear, it is likely
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.L. Mehta and anr. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1962Bom82; (1961)63BOMLR642
matter I very much doubt if any other Registrar of Trade Marks could go behind the finding of fact arrived at application for registration of the word 'Sulekha' as a trade mark was made, had gone deep into the matter himself and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnneliese Huckmann Nee Merz and anr. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1962Bom88; (1961)63BOMLR650
in relation to any goods for the purpose of a trade mark, and quite rightly so. The word 'Patent' conveys a claim any registration of the word 'Patentex' as a trade mark in respect of their contraceptives. Mr. Shah however, contended that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoots Company Plc, England and anr. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Mumb ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR36; (2002)3BOMLR574; 2002(2)MhLj834
: AIR1975Mad74 , wherein the contest was between the two trade names 'Ortho-gynol' and 'utogynol', the Court held that orthographically and and (e) are relevant and the same read as under:--A mark (a) the use of which would be likely to deceive
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>