Town Hall - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: town hall Page 1 of about 26 results (0.026 seconds)Secy., Town Hall Committee, Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-01-2006
Reported in: (2006)(106)ECC181
careful consideration, we are of prima facie consideration that a Town Hall built by Mysore City Corporation for holding public functions, as "Mandap Keeper". The activities carried out in the Town Hall do not come within the ambit of "Mandap Keeper". The
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Secretary, Town Hall Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-29-2007
Reported in: (2007)8STR170
to which 'social function' includes 'marriage'. He stated that the Town Hall is given on rent for the following purposes: (ii) is the Mysore City Corporation. They let out the Town Hall of the Corporation for cultural functions and organising of Political
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation Town Hall Vs. Vaneet Mahajan and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-16-2014
CR No.3456 of 2014 Date of Decision: 16.05.2014 Municipal Corporation, Town Hall Amritsar ....Petitioner Versus Vaneet Mahajan and others ....Respondents CORAM:- No.3456 of 2014 Date of Decision: 16.05.2014 Municipal Corporation, Town Hall Amritsar ....Petitioner Versus Vaneet Mahajan and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPresent: Mr. A.S. Bakshi Advocate Vs. the Municipal Corporation Amrits ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Singh .......Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation, Amritsar through its Commissioner, Town Hall, Amritsar ......Respondent Present: Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advocate for the .......Appellant Versus The Municipal Corporation, Amritsar through its Commissioner, Town Hall, Amritsar ......Respondent Present: Mr. A.S. Bakshi, Advocate for the appellant.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPatri Vyapar Mandal Delhi (Regd.) Vs. M.C.D. Town Hall and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-09-2009
Reported in: 2009(5)SCALE310; (2009)12SCC475
ORDERMukundakam Sharma, J.1. By this common order we propose to dispose of various applications filed by the parties hereto including...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrij Mohan Verma Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Co ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-2011
SHRI M.L. CHAUHAN: 1. The applicant has filed this review application for reviewing the order dated 19.9.2011 whereby the OA...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajbir Sharma Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi Through Its Commissio ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2012
DR. VEENA CHHOTRAY, MEMBER (A) 1. The applicant an ex-Assistant Malaria Inspector under the M.C.D. has through this O.A. sought...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShibban Vs. Competent Authority, Urban Ceiling Town Hall, Meerut and O ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-02-1998
Reported in: 1998(3)AWC2117
Sudhir Narain, J.1. The petitioner seeks writ of certiorari quashing the notice dated 31.3.1998 issued by the Competent Authority. Urban...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAzad Rickshaw Pullers' Union (Regd.) Ch. Town Hall, Amritsar and Ors. ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-05-1980
Reported in: AIR1981SC14a; 1980Supp(1)SCC601; [1981]1SCR366; 1980(12)LC807(SC)
Krishna Iyer, J.1. The challenge in theses writ petitions compel us to remind ourselves that under our constitutional system courts...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGainda Ram and ors. Vs. M.C.D., Town Hall and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-12-1993
Reported in: JT1993(3)SC396; 1993(2)SCALE893; (1993)3SCC178; [1993]3SCR704
ORDER1. In Saudan Singh v. NDMC and Ors. : [1992]2SCR243 we laid down certain guidelines in paragraph 11 of the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »