To State - Judgment Search Results
The Raj. State Mines and Minerals Ltd Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER DB Civil Misc. Review Petition No.120/2013 In DB Civil Writ Petition No.1852/2002 The Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd.v.State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :: 30th June, 2014 P R E
Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. State and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-21-1964
Reported in: (1966)ILLJ488Ker
M.S. Menon, C.J.1. The Kerala State Electricity Board, respondent 1 in Original Petition No. 1949 of 1962, is the appellant before us. Respondents 2
State Vs. Siddarth Vashisth and Manu Sharma and Others and Raja Chopra ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-13-2000
Reported in: 2001IIIAD(Delhi)829; 2001CriLJ2404; 90(2001)DLT548
in case FIR No.287/99 registered with P.S. Mehrauli, commonly known as 'Jessica Lal Murder Case'.2. In Crl.R.596/2000, the State prays to set aside the discharge of accused No.1 Manu Sharma, accused No.2 Vikas Yadav, accused No.3 Amardeep
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ramu Vs. State By
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2020
in India alone is 20% as per the information from the World Bank. (b) It is also relevant to state that when the ghastly incident occurred on 13.10.2012, no human being was there except nature. The nature has … appreciation and that by itself shows that her evidence is genuine and wholly reliable.36. It is also relevant to state, at this stage, that inspite of gang rape by the accused persons on the 102 victim between 9.30
Raja Vs. State By
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-2020
in India alone is 20% as per the information from the World Bank. (b) It is also relevant to state that when the ghastly incident occurred on 13.10.2012, no human being was there except nature. The nature has … appreciation and that by itself shows that her evidence is genuine and wholly reliable.36. It is also relevant to state, at this stage, that inspite of gang rape by the accused persons on the 102 victim between 9.30
Punith Vs. State By
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-24-2023
BANGALORE - 560 072. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI ARUN G, ADV.) - 2 - CRL.P No.7585 of 2021 AND:1. STATE BY K.R. PETE TOWN POLICE, MANDYA (REPRESENTED BY STATE SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX) 2. RAGHAVENDRA S/O
State By Vs. Mithun Kumar
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-03-2022
OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M.JOSHI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.347 OF2016BETWEEN: State by Assistant Superintendent of Police Puttur, D.K., Rep. by the State Public Prosecutor Bengaluru - 574201. ...Appellant (By
State By Vs. T Manjunath
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-26-2024
JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.422/2018 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.599/2018 IN CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.422/2018: BETWEEN: STATE BY KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA POLICE, CITY DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001. … PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASAD B.S., ADVOCATE) AND:1. . T.MANJUNATH SENIOR
Aslam vs State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-14-2026
FIR No. 106/1998 registered at P.S. Nabi Karim, Delhi, challenges a purported “Punishment Ticket” dated 23.07.2024, which is stated to have been issued by the Jail Authorities. 2. Mr. Yugansh Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits
State vs Vinod Kumar Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-10-2026
15.01.2026 Pronounced on: 10.04.2026 + CRL.A. 255/2021 VINOD KUMAR AHUJA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Kumar Pruthi, Adv. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with Mr. Manvendra Yadav, Advocate and SI Sanjeeta, PS Mukherjee Nagar WITH
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free