To Initiate - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: to initiate Page 1 of about 72 results (0.032 seconds)Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. Vs. Siracusano
Court: US Supreme Court
Remedy accounted for approximately 70 percent of Matrixxs sales. Respondents initiated this securities fraud class action against Matrixx on behalf of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSwift Initiative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dilip Chhabria Design Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
agreement during the renewed Term i.e. after expiry of the initial Term, whether with or without cause there shall be no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“initially the Investigation the Case Was Carried out by S.i. Hukam ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
the FIR (Annexure P1) deserves to be quashed at this initial stage for want of evidence. As to whether the petitioners
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTInitiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...
Court: Delhi
is appointed under Section 7. The proceedings for confiscation are initiated by the Initiating Officer under Section 24 of the W.P.(C)
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrabha Misra Initially Dixit (Smt.) Vs. District Judge
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: (2005)1UPLBEC645
and not to interfere with her functioning.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as a Stenographer in the Civil Courts, Kanpur Dehat
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“24. Initiating the Argument Shri N.K. Tanwar Vs. M/S Goodyear India ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
judgment of lower appellate Court be noticed, which read thus:24. Initiating the argument Shri N.K. Tanwar, Advocate Learned counsel for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Reported in: (2008)9STR509
C&F Agency fee paid to them.In addition to above, M/s. Initiating Explosives System India Ltd. the Appellant contended that service tax
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLawyers Initiative Through Its Member Veena Kumari Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15133-1996 Date of decision:-04.02.2014 Lawyers Initiative through its member Veena Kumari, Advocate and member Lawyers Initiative
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiative for Transportation and Development Pro Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinitiative for Transportation and Development Prog Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>