To Establish - Judgment Search Results
Sylcon Trading Establishment vs Union of India
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Apr-02-2025
THE 2nd DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 12TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 10084 OF 2019 PETITIONER/S: SYLCON TRADING ESTABLISHMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER MR. SHIRAZ K.V., AGED 44 YEARS S/O. K HAMZOO, NOORJAHAN, HOUSE NO. 36/1728,
Landmark Establishments (P.) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Guwahati Municipal Corp ...
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Aug-23-2006
B. Sudershan Reddy, C.J.1. The writ petitioner No. 1 is a private limited company engaged in the real estate business of which the 2nd petitioner is the Managing Director.2. The present writ petition has been filed...
Special Police Establishment Lokayukt Vs. Secretary the State of Madhy ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Petition No.7103/2009 Special Police Establishment (Lokayukt), Bhopal…………………………….Petitioner Versus State of M. P. and others…………………………………………………………Respondents For the petitioner: Shri Aditya Adhikari and Shri Satish
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Establishment Committee of the Board of Governors National Institute o ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the order dated 29.3.2011 made in O.A.No.1222 of 2009 on the...
Al Mustaneer Establishment for Trade Vs. Varuna Overseas Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-1998
Reported in: 1998IIAD(Delhi)481; 72(1998)DLT186
of credit and that any claim received from the openers of the letters of credit M/s Al Mustaneer Establishment, Jeddeah, Saudi Arabia, the plaintiff in this regard will be settled/paid by M/s Kupal Material & Metal Private
V.K. Brahamankar Vs. Special Police Establishment
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-31-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)MPHT58
this appeal shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 2110/1997 (Smt. Vandana Brahamankar v. Special Police Establishment) and Criminal Appeal No. 2183/1997 (Shivkumar Gupta and Anr. v. The State of M.P. and Anr.) as they
Raj Rajeshwari Nandan Gupta Vs. Special Police Establishment, Lok Ayuk ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-23-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)MPHT174
explanation can be said to have been established. It is further clear that the accused is not required to establish his defence by proving beyond reasonable doubt as the prosecution, but can establish the same by preponderance of … explanation can be said to have been established - It is further clear that accused is not required to establish his defence by proving beyond reasonable doubt as prosecution, but can establish same by preponderance of probability -
Varuna Overseas P. Ltd. and Others Vs. Al-mustaneer Establishment and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-2012
and the exit route is not clearly discernible. 2. We begin by noting that the plaintiff, „M/s.Al Mustaneer Establishment for Trade‟, a company registered in Saudi Arabia, filed a suit in which 19 defendants were impleaded; being,
K.K. Shrivastava Vs. Special Police Establishment Lokayukt Gwalior
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-25-2012
Reported in: 2012CrLJ2189
basis of the aforesaid, it is prayed that by allowing the petitions, the FIR lodged by the Police Establishment Bhopal vis-a-vis the investigation and the charge-sheet filed before the trial Special Judge be quashed. In support of
Harinder Pal Kaur Vs. Director Establishment W/C Dda and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
W.P.(C) No.5824/2013 % HARINDER PAL KAUR Through:13. h September , 2013 ......Petitioner Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. VERSUS DIRECTOR ESTABLISHMENT W/C DDA & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free