Though Ex V Has - Judgment Search Results

N. V. Builders Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of 2012, as common questions of law and facts are involved. The grievance of the petitioners is that though Section 10C of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 was struck down by this Court vide judgment … CHANDIGARH COCP No.1363 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:1. 3.2013 N.V.Builders .Petitioner v. Vijay N. Zade and another .Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Present: … not from the date the tax was deducted. Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from Davinder Kumar, Excise and Taxation Officer, Ludhiana-II, submitted that on account of some mis-interpretation, the amount of interest was calculated from

V. Vs. George V. Commissioner of Agrl. Income Tax.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1985)45CTR(Ker)142

the non-participation and failure to raise the objections now raised before the assessing authority by the parties concerned, though they had a chance to demur the sending or serving all the assessment orders on all the partners … ORDERK. S. Paripoornan, J. - The petitioner is an ex-partner of a firm. The firm was constituted by a Deed of Partnership dt. 27-7-1968. It was an assessee … Agricultural IT on the files of the 2nd respondent - Agrl. ITO, Vythiri. It is alleged that the firm was dissolved by a Deed of

V. Vs. S. Natarajan V. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1978]111ITR539(Mad)

family was available only to a coparcener and such a right is not available to a female member though a wife, mother and grand-mother are entitled to be allotted a share in the event of there being … was being assessed as a Hindu undivided family. It consists of one V. V. S. Pandurangan, who is the karta, his wife, Rajeswari, and their … writing stating that Rs. 10,000 had been set apart for being utilised for the education, maintenance and marriage expenses of his two daughters and that they had become their absolute properties. It was also stated in the

V. Vs. Rama Rao Naidu V. Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad, and Ot ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1961]42ITR80(AP)

is sub-section (1) of section 24B of the Indian Income-tax Act, which provides :'Where a person dies, his executor, administrator, or other legal representative shall be liable to pay out of the estate of the deceased person … J. - The common question which falls for determination in these writ petitions is whether the Income-tax Officer, Vizianagaram Circle, was right in treating the petitioner as the legal representative of his mother Mahalakshmamma, and in that

V. Vs. R. N. Vr. Nagappa Chettiar V. Income-tax Officer, Karaikudi, an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1958]33ITR226(Mad)

that the assessee had put in an application for extension of time on March 10, 1949, and that though no formal orders were passed on that application still the fact that the Income-tax Officer did not proceed … payment till February 25, 1942. But beyond that date at the instance of the assessee, time was being extended from time to time. Of these extensions we need mention only that granted on June 30, 1947, December … the years 1939-40, 1940-41 and 1941-42.The point that is raised is a very short one, and the question is whether the certificates issued under section

V vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 980/2026 V .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anushkaa Arora, Adv. (DHCLSC) with Ms. Anchal Yadav, Adv.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

V vs State of Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1622/2026, CRL.M.A. 16231/2026 V ...Petitioner Through: Ms. Pallavi Garg (DHCLSC) and Ms. Sanjana Sharma Sahu, Advs.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI ...Respondent Through: … of the case. iv. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the Jail Superintendent on the date of expiry of the period of four weeks of parole at or before 04:00 PM.7. Copy of this order be

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M No.7554 of 2013 Date of decision : May 06, 2013 Gurnam Singh Lali, .....Petitioner v. State of Punjab and otheRs......Respondents *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present : Mr.Sandeep Arora, Advocate … FIR and all subsequent proceedings, emanating therefrom are quashed. It is a fit case where this Court should exercise jurisdiction, under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C to put an end to these futile criminal proceedings. Even otherwise,

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

1997 (O&M) Date of decision : August 30, 2013 Haryana State Co-op Supply & Marketing Federation Limited, .....Petitioner v. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Hisar & another, .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI *** Present … the petitioner has fairly stated that in that event, he would not press this writ petition provided the exorbitant interest @ 18% Kumar Kishan 2013.08.31 10:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High

*** Vs. V.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision : January 16, 2013 Dr. Kiran Sharma .....Petitioner v. U.T.Chandigarh Administration .....Respondent *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.Vineet Sehgal, Advocate, for the