Thereafter V Swaminathan - Judgment Search Results

M.V. Swaminathan Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police SPE: ...

Court: Chennai

Matched in: Parties M.V. Swaminathan Vs. The State Represented by Inspector of Police SPE:CBI:ACB, Chennai

Mrs. E.V. Swaminathan Vs. K.M.M.A. Industries and Roadways Private Ltd ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1993]76CompCas1(Mad)

petitioner has also been designated as the managing director of the company. According to the petitioner, her husband, Swaminathan, and the second respondent's husband, David, who are brothers have acquired all the shares from the members of … R.P. David, the husband pf the second respondent, has been ateending to the affairs of the company in view of the close relationship and the confidence reposed by the petitioner in him. The registeres, books and other

A.P. State Federation of Coop. Spinning Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. P.V. S ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR332]; JT2001(3)SC530; (2001)ILLJ1341SC; (2001)10SCC83

Matched in: Parties A.P. State Federation of Coop. Spinning Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. P.V. Swaminathan

Government of India Represented by the Secretary Vs. K.V. Swaminathan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996(8)SCALE698; (1997)10SCC190; [1996]Supp8SCR737

Matched in: Parties Government of India Represented by the Secretary Vs. K.V. Swaminathan

The Executive Officer, Kadathur Town Panchayat Vs. V. Swaminathan,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(3)CTC270; (2004)2MLJ708

Matched in: Parties The Executive Officer, Kadathur Town Panchayat Vs. V. Swaminathan,

A.Ramakrishnan Vs. P.V.Swaminathan

Court: Kerala

Matched in: Parties A.Ramakrishnan Vs. P.V.Swaminathan

Colgate-palmolive and Others Vs. Dr. K.V. Swaminathan and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1991Bom111; 1990(3)BomCR452

and inadequate and registration cannot be declined. The Government of India then gave hearing to the petitioners and thereafter on December 17, 1982, the Registrar intimated to the petitioners the order, rejecting the registration of petitioner No. … 1. The petitioner No. 2 are a public limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act No. VII of 1913and are engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of tooth paste, cosmetics and toilet preparations.

S. Nagaraj Vs. S.V. Swaminathan

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: II(1993)DMC241; ILR1993KAR1531; 1993(2)KarLJ118

Matched in: Parties S. Nagaraj Vs. S.V. Swaminathan