Thereafter - Judgment Search Results
thereafter the Respondent Husband Filed a Petition Under Vs. Parveen K ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
child is stated to be residing separately at her parental home at Karnal. T.A.No.377 of 2012 (O&M) #2# Thereafter, the respondent husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act which, as noticed above, is pending
Was thereafter in 1990 That She Selected for the Post of Technical Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
13:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.2455 of 1993 2 was thereafter in 1990 that she selected for the post of Technical Assistant (Grade II) and since then she has
Malini Ayyappa Naicker (Now Dead) Through I.R. Etc. Vs. Seth Manghraj ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-13-1969
Reported in: AIR1969SC1344; (1969)1SCC688; [1969]3SCR698
Matched in: Parties Malini Ayyappa Naicker (Now Dead) Through I.R. Etc. Vs. Seth Manghraj Udhavadas Firm by Managing Partner Chathurthuj Chhabildas (Dead) thereafter by I.Ss. and ors.
18-section briefs on any result in this list
This Outlet Including the Private-respondents and Only thereafter Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
of this document LPA No.1103 of 2013 (O & M) -2- this outlet, including the private-respondents and only thereafter, the shifting of outlet was ordered. During the couRs.of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners could not point
Was Not Being Taught there. thereafter Government Made Vs. State of Ha ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
sanctioned post of Lecturer in Sanskrit in existence. Even the subject of Sanskrit was not being taught there. Thereafter, Government made Anil Kumar 2013.09.30 10:02another effort to appoint the petitioner to service which was I attest to
Lal Mohammad (Since Deceased) thereafter Jan Mohammad and Others Vs. I ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Dec-10-1999
Reported in: 2000(2)AWC1444
dispute. The said suit was decreed on the basis of the compromise vide judgment and decree dated 23.5.1983. Thereafter, respondent No. 3 filed Original Suit No. 619 of 1989 for declaration that Judgment and decree passed in
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free