The University - Judgment Search Results

University Vs. People

Court: US Supreme Court

the judgment of that court can be reviewed here. 3. That the lots, lands, and other property of the university, the annual profits of which, by way of rent or otherwise, are devoted to the purposes of the … the exempting power of the legislature was not limited to real estate occupied or in immediate use by the university. At the June Term, 1875, of the County Court of Cook County, Illinois, application in the manner prescribed

Bayly Vs. University

Court: US Supreme Court

Bayly v. University - 106 U.S. 11 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court Bayly v. University, 106 U.S. 11 (1882) Bayly v. University

University Vs. Finch

Court: US Supreme Court

real estate so conveyed was sold by Ranlett in accordance with the terms of the trust deed, to the university, on the 9th day of December, 1862. The trustee made to the university, which was a corporate body, … of the trust deed, to the university, on the 9th day of December, 1862. The trustee made to the university, which was a corporate body, a deed for the land, and the university afterwards sold it for value

Ramani Bhushan Prasad Vs. University

Court: Jharkhand

observation that the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is not applicable to the retired Professor of the University, therefore, the grievance of the petitioners for payment of interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 is … for others and the petitioners cannot take any undue advantage for any wrong committed on the part of the University.6. Be that as it may, if the petitioners are able to show any provision under any statute or

C.B.C.i. Society Vs. University

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1985KAR855

regulating the service conditions of the teachers on 13-1-1981 (Annexure-G) and the Statutes governing conditions of affiliation to the University, on 23-2-1981 (Annexure-H). These statutes have been made applicable to all the affiliated colleges of the Bangalore University … the Bangalore University has treated minority institution established by the 1st Petitioner just like all other affiliated colleges. The University had no power to frame and apply the statutes, the validity of which has been challenged in the

University Of Delhi Vs. Delhi University Contract Employees Union

Court: Supreme Court of India

the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in LPA No.989/2013. The appeal preferred by University of Delhi (“the University” for short) i.e. Civil Appeal No.1007 of 2021 arising out of SLP(C) No.17486 of 2017 is taken as … at and directions were issued by the Division Bench of the High Court:- “Conclusion I. The decision of the University of Delhi to grant one time age exemption to all contract labour who may have served for over

Sivamoorthy Vs. University of Madras and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2001)10SCC483

of Criminology, New Delhi, Professor of Criminology, Varanasi and the Director General of Police, Madras. The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Madras was the ex officio Chairman of the aforesaid Selection Board. It appears that his appointment was … not possess the required qualification in the subject of Criminology to be appointed as Reader in Criminology in the University of Madras.3. The qualifications prescribed by the University for the post in question at the relevant point of

Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru Unive ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC567; 1985LabIC762; (1985)IILLJ330SC; 1985(1)SCALE53; (1985)2SCC32; 1985(17)LC457(SC)

and accept responsibility for any amateur tinkering with matters of educational policy.2. According to the present policy of the University, eligibility for admission to the Entrance examination for post-graduate courses is now confined to those graduates who have … done a course of study for full 15 years, out of which three years must have been at the University level. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the University it is stated that the admission policy of

Calicut University Teachers' Assn. Vs. the Chancellor University of Ca ...

Court: Kerala

held as per Section 21(a) of the Calicut University Act, from among the members of the Senate of the University. Senate of the University has been reconstituted with effect from 30-8-2007 as per Ext. P7, which includes respondents … 21(a) of the Calicut University Act, from among the members of the Senate of the University. Senate of the University has been reconstituted with effect from 30-8-2007 as per Ext. P7, which includes respondents 4 to 9, whose

Delhi University and Colleges Standsc Employees Welf Vs. University of ...

Court: Delhi

recruitment process was completed only after undoubtedly getting sanction of the posts in terms of the letter of the University dated 3.10.2012. Academic issues have no bearing for decision in a court of law. Really, an academic issue